public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: "Chauhan, Vijay" <Vijay.Chauhan@lsi.com>
Cc: "'dm-devel@redhat.com'" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]scsi_dh_rdac: Retry for NOT_READY check condition (0x02A102, 0x020401, 0x020404 and  0x020407) in rdac_check_sense
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:46:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1236699991.14822.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0D1E8821739E724A86F4D16902CE275C140E25CA0C@inbmail01.lsi.com>

On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 18:30 +0530, Chauhan, Vijay wrote:
> This patch adds retry for NOT_READY check conditions(02/A1/02, 02/04/01, 02/04/04,
> 02/04/07) in rdac_check_sense.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vijay Chauhan<vijay.chauhan@lsi.com>
> 
> ---
> --- linux-2.6.29-rc7/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c.orig	2009-03-10 17:42:27.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.29-rc7/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c	2009-03-10 18:05:35.000000000 +0530
> @@ -562,6 +562,30 @@ static int rdac_check_sense(struct scsi_
>  			 * Just retry and wait.
>  			 */
>  			return ADD_TO_MLQUEUE;
> +		if (sense_hdr->asc == 0xA1  && sense_hdr->ascq == 0x02)
> +			/* LUN Not Ready - Quiescense in progress
> +			 * or has been achieved
> +			 * Just retry.
> +			 */
> +			return ADD_TO_MLQUEUE;

This is fine, being vendor specific, we don't handle it at the mid-layer

> +		if (sense_hdr->asc == 0x04 && sense_hdr->ascq == 0x01)
> +			/* LUN Not Ready - Logical Unit Not Ready and is in
> +			 * the process of becoming ready
> +			 * Just retry.
> +			 */
> +			return ADD_TO_MLQUEUE;
> +		if (sense_hdr->asc == 0x04 && sense_hdr->ascq == 0x04)
> +			/* LUN Not Ready - Format In Progress
> +			 *
> +			 * Just retry.
> +			 */
> +			return ADD_TO_MLQUEUE;
> +		if (sense_hdr->asc == 0x04  && sense_hdr->ascq == 0x07)
> +			/* LUN Not Ready - Storage controller cannot respond
> +			 * immediately to a PRIN or PROUT command.
> +			 * Just retry.
> +			 */
> +			return ADD_TO_MLQUEUE;

For all of these ... along with a few other not ready types, we already
do a delayed retry at the mid-layer (in scsi_io_completion).  Is there
some problem that causes this to need to be handled here as well?

James

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-10 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-10 13:00 [PATCH]scsi_dh_rdac: Retry for NOT_READY check condition (0x02A102, 0x020401, 0x020404 and 0x020407) in rdac_check_sense Chauhan, Vijay
2009-03-10 15:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-03-10 15:46 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2009-03-17 13:21   ` Chauhan, Vijay
2009-03-24 19:38     ` Chandra Seetharaman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1236699991.14822.0.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=Vijay.Chauhan@lsi.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox