public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: "Mike Miller (OS Dev)" <mikem@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	LKML-SCSI <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	coldwell@redhat.com, hare@novell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] cciss: resubmit kernel scan thread for MSA2012
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:50:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1236700241.14822.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090310151738.GA18243@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net>

On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 10:17 -0500, Mike Miller (OS Dev) wrote:
> Patch 1 of 1
> 
> This is yet another go at the patch to detect changes on the MSA2012.
> I hope I've addressed all concerns. This patch rearranges some of the
> code
> so we also have coverage in the sg and the ioctl paths as well as the
> main
> data path.
> 
> The MSA2012 cannot inform the driver of configuration changes since
> all
> management is out of band. This is a departure from any storage we
> have
> supported in the past. We need some way to detect changes on the
> topology so
> we implement this kernel thread. In some instances there's nothing we
> can do
> from the driver (like LUN failure) so just print out a message. In the
> case
> where logical volumes are added or deleted we call rebuild_lun_table
> to
> refresh the driver's view of the world.
> 
> Changelog:
> 1. Do the completion(hba[i]->rescan_wait) before calling kthread_stop,
> this resolves the issue of waiting for the timeout on rmmod
> 2. Added a new function called check_ioctl_unit_attention to cover
> UA's
> from the ioctl patch
> 3. I preserved the wait_for_completion_timeout to avoid call traces
> caused by /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs expiring
> 4. Moved the call to check_for_unit_attention to
> evaluate_target_status
> since it's already called from complete_command
> 5. Add retry_cmd as an argument to evaluate_target_status
> 6. Added *rescan_wait to the controller info struct
> 7. Changed wait_for_completion_timeout to
> wait_for_completion_interruptible.
> This will allow kthread_should_stop to stop the thread immediately
> with no race.
> 
> Please consider this for inclusion.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Miller <mike.miller@hp.com>
[...]
> @@ -3834,6 +3917,9 @@ static void __devexit cciss_remove_one(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	kthread_stop(hba[i]->cciss_scan_thread);
> +	complete(hba[i]->rescan_wait);

This complete is superfluous (the kthread_stop will wake the
wait_for_completion_interruptible() and if it doesn't, you won't get to
the complete() because kthread_stop() waits for the thread to die).

Otherwise, the rest of this looks fine to me.

James



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-10 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-10 15:17 [PATCH 1/1] cciss: resubmit kernel scan thread for MSA2012 Mike Miller (OS Dev)
2009-03-10 15:46 ` Mike Miller (OS Dev)
2009-03-10 15:50 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2009-03-10 16:34   ` Mike Miller (OS Dev)
2009-03-10 22:39     ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-11 14:31       ` Mike Miller (OS Dev)
2009-03-11 15:21       ` Mike Miller (OS Dev)
2009-03-11 16:17       ` Mike Miller (OS Dev)
2009-03-11 22:14         ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-12 16:26           ` Mike Miller (OS Dev)
2009-06-15 20:39             ` Mike Miller (OS Dev)
2009-06-15 21:25               ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-15 22:17                 ` Mike Miller (OS Dev)
2009-06-15 22:41                   ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-16 19:07                     ` Mike Miller (OS Dev)
2009-06-16 19:17                       ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1236700241.14822.4.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=coldwell@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@novell.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikem@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox