From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH] lpfc : add module parameter that allows adapter instances to avoid attachment Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:19:07 -0500 Message-ID: <1238098747.3342.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1238097300.27023.2.camel@ogier> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from accolon.hansenpartnership.com ([76.243.235.52]:34006 "EHLO accolon.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752495AbZCZUTG (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:19:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1238097300.27023.2.camel@ogier> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James.Smart@Emulex.Com Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 15:55 -0400, James Smart wrote: > This patch adds a module parameter that supplies a text string containing a > list of PCI :. values to identify adapter instances that > should *not* be attached to by the driver. > > -- james s > > > Signed-off-by: James Smart Is there a reason why you can't just use the generic unbind interface? James