From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Ahmed A <ahmedcali@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Stale devices in sysfs
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:44:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1238103888.3342.67.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <635936.80425.qm@web32508.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 11:51 -0700, Ahmed A wrote:
>
>
> --- On Thu, 3/26/09, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:
>
> > From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> > Subject: Re: Stale devices in sysfs
> > To: "Ahmed A" <ahmedcali@yahoo.com>
> > Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> > Date: Thursday, March 26, 2009, 10:41 AM
> > On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 10:16 -0700,
> > Ahmed A wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have a two port FC hba in my system. The hba
> > is properly connecting
> > > to a Target, and I can tell it seems all the LUNs
> > exported to it.
> > > However, when I browse through the
> > /sys/class/scsi_host/...
> > > directory , and output of "lsscsi", I can see "sd"
> > mappings that are
> > > old and invalid (cannot write to them). In my
> > ouput below,
> > > sd[e/f/g/h] and sd[c/d] are invalid.
> > >
> > > 1. Is there an command I an issue to flush out the
> > older mappings?
> > >
> > > 2. Is this a bug in the FC driver?
> > >
> > > [root@pe850 ~]# lsscsi
> > > [2:0:0:10] disk 3PARdata
> > VV
> > 0000 /dev/sde
> > > [2:0:0:11] disk 3PARdata
> > VV
> > 0000 /dev/sdf
> > > [2:0:0:254] enclosu 3PARdata SES
> > 0000 -
> >
> > > [2:0:1:10] disk 3PARdata
> > VV
> > 0000 /dev/sdg
> > > [2:0:1:11] disk 3PARdata
> > VV
> > 0000 /dev/sdh
> > > [2:0:1:254] enclosu 3PARdata SES
> > 0000 -
> >
> > > [2:0:2:10] disk 3PARdata
> > VV
> > 0000 /dev/sdi
> > > [2:0:2:11] disk 3PARdata
> > VV
> > 0000 /dev/sdj
> > > [2:0:2:254] enclosu 3PARdata SES
> > 0000 -
> >
> > > [3:0:0:10] disk 3PARdata
> > VV
> > 0000 /dev/sdc
> > > [3:0:0:11] disk 3PARdata
> > VV
> > 0000 /dev/sdd
> > > [3:0:0:254] enclosu 3PARdata SES
> > 0000 -
> >
> > > [3:0:1:10] disk 3PARdata
> > VV
> > 0000 /dev/sdk
> > > [3:0:1:11] disk 3PARdata
> > VV
> > 0000 /dev/sdl
> > > [3:0:1:254] enclosu 3PARdata SES
> > 0000 -
> >
> > > [root@pe850 ~]#
> >
> > It's very hard to tell anything without knowing which fibre
> > HBA or
> > looking in the logs. However, I'd say you've had some
> > disconnect event
> > which exceeded the devloss timeout twice on HBA 2 and once
> > on HBA 1 ...
> > this causes LUNs to be re-presented in exactly this fashion
> > (with the
> > target number incrementing).
> >
> > It sounds like the problem is whatever event caused this,
> > and there's
> > insufficient information to make any guesses about that.
> >
> > James
> >
> >
> >
>
> Hi James,
>
> Thank you for your reply. It is an Emulex 2 port FC hba (LPE11002),
> using the inbox driver version 8.2.0.33.3p. Yes, there have been some
> disconnect, initiatied by me by disabling / enablling the port on the
> target. Even in these situations, wouldn't the driver remove the
> old/stale mappings? I am guessing from you response, there is no way
> for me to clean-up the old ones.
The delete caused by rport removal is supposed to remove them. There
should be a message in the logs, something like :
blocked FC remote port time out: removing target and saving binding
You can delete any of the devices by just doing
echo 1 > /sys/class/scsi_device/<h:c:t:l>/device/delete
> As to figure out which ones are real, just use the sd mapping with the
> latest target number, right?
Yes, the transport class allocates them from a per host incrementing
variable.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-26 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-26 18:51 Stale devices in sysfs Ahmed A
2009-03-26 21:44 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2009-03-27 13:37 ` James Smart
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-26 17:16 Ahmed A
2009-03-26 17:41 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1238103888.3342.67.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=ahmedcali@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox