From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
To: Grant Grundler <grundler@google.com>
Cc: "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@lsi.com>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"Chauhan, Vijay" <Vijay.Chauhan@lsi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm mpath: Try recover from I/O failure by re-initializing the PG if device is running on one path
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:29:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1240428589.19442.14.camel@chandra-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da824cf30904221041h40b87096yb4cb2784f31c5270@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 10:41 -0700, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@lsi.com> wrote:
> > This patch introduces the mechanism to recover from I/O failures by re-initializing the path if the device is running on only one path.
> >
> > Problem: Device mapper fails the path for every I/O error.
> > It does not care about the type of error.
>
> This is the fundamental problem. Different layers of the block IO
> path have to agree on how to handle each possible type of error that
> can be returned. I don't know where to find such an agreement and
> think an implementation that does discriminate is needed.
>
> > There are certain errors which can be recovered by re-initializing the path again. I have seen this problem during my testing on rdac device handler. I have observed I/O errors when there is a change in Lun ownership. When Lun ownership changes device will return back with check condition with sense 0x05/0x94/0x01(SK/ASC/ASCQ -meaning Lun ownership changed). Currently, device mapper fails the path for this error and eventually this will lead to I/O error. We don't want to see I/O error for this reason.
>
> 1) This patch isn't discriminating between transport, media, or other
> device errors. Wouldn't it make sense to discriminate?
yes it is. But currently we do not have it.
> "LUN ownership changed" sounds like some of the events possible in
> multi-inititiator enviroment would want to be notified about and
> perhaps even take some action (renegotiate access to
>
> 2) Will this result in resetting a SATA device?
> I ask because device reset may result in data loss due to WCE enabled.
> I just don't know the higher parts of the block SW stack and how
> errors flow up the stack.
The device is not hung, the I/O will come back after a while.
BTW, activate doesn't do a reset, it just sends a command (in lsi rdac
case, it just sends a mode select) to the controller.
>
> thanks,
> grant
>
> >
> > The patch will set the flag pg_init_required if the device is running on single path. The process_queued_ios will re-initialize path if required. I have tested this patch on LSI rdac handler.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@lsi.com>
> > ---
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.30-rc2/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c.orig 2009-04-17 16:49:33.000000000 -0500
> > +++ linux-2.6.30-rc2/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c 2009-04-17 17:09:51.000000000 -0500
> > @@ -1152,6 +1152,15 @@ static int do_end_io(struct multipath *m
> > return error;
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&m->lock, flags);
> > + /*
> > + * If this is the only path left, then lets try to
> > + * re-initialize the PG one last time..
> > + */
> > + if (m->nr_valid_paths == 1 && m->hw_handler_name) {
> > + m->pg_init_required = 1;
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->lock, flags);
> > + goto requeue;
> > + }
> > if (!m->nr_valid_paths) {
> > if (__must_push_back(m)) {
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->lock, flags);
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-22 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-20 18:05 [PATCH] dm mpath: Try recover from I/O failure by re-initializing the PG if device is running on one path Moger, Babu
2009-04-21 1:06 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-04-21 17:06 ` Moger, Babu
2009-04-22 1:52 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2009-04-22 14:03 ` Moger, Babu
2009-04-22 17:33 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-22 17:43 ` Moger, Babu
2009-04-22 17:41 ` Grant Grundler
2009-04-22 18:16 ` Moger, Babu
2009-04-22 19:29 ` Chandra Seetharaman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1240428589.19442.14.camel@chandra-ubuntu \
--to=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=Babu.Moger@lsi.com \
--cc=Vijay.Chauhan@lsi.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=grundler@google.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sekharan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox