From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/24] mpt fusion: [2.6.30-rc6] small fix for 1078 data corruption issue Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:27:03 -0500 Message-ID: <1243002423.2873.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20090522104130.GF16245@lsi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:55915 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753960AbZEVO1E (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2009 10:27:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090522104130.GF16245@lsi.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Kashyap, Desai" Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Eric.Moore@lsi.com, Sathya.Prakash@lsi.com On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 16:11 +0530, Kashyap, Desai wrote: > Patch applied on 21/01/2009: "Fixing 1078 data curruption" need this changes > also. > message flags will use runtime sense width instead of compile time as > explain in patch applied on 21/01/2009 "Fixing 1078 data curruption". This description doesn't make a whole lot of sense, since patch "Fixing 1078 data corruption" is 1/24 of this series ... I take it these two patches should be merged? James