From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chandra Seetharaman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] scsi_dh: Add ability to set parameters for scsi device handler Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:47:02 -0700 Message-ID: <1246567622.7381.7.camel@chandra-ubuntu> References: <20090702031308.28354.73353.sendpatchset@chandra-ubuntu> <1246563299.8018.9.camel@eddie-laptop> <1246566564.8018.21.camel@eddie-laptop> Reply-To: sekharan@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.159]:37088 "EHLO e38.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753313AbZGBUoa (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:44:30 -0400 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e38.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n62KfLUO004503 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:41:21 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n62KiVcK105070 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:44:31 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n62KiUdL007713 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:44:31 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1246566564.8018.21.camel@eddie-laptop> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Eddie Williams Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, agk@redhat.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, Benoit_Arthur@emc.com, asson_ronald@emc.com, berthiaume_wayne@emc.com On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 16:29 -0400, Eddie Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 15:34 -0400, Eddie Williams wrote: > > I have tried to set this up but have run into a problem probably due to > > my error. It has been a while since I have had to build kernels... > > > > I pulled 2.6.31-rc1, applied the two patches below and then applied the > > 3 patches for the interface. The new kernel loads fine but when a > > trespass command is sent I get an panic. I am looking though how I > > built the kernel and perhaps build with your 3 patches to see if it > > happened before. > > I backed out the 3 patches with the same panic. > Which version of the kernel were you originally testing with ? (when you found the feature was gone).