From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Allan Wind <allan_wind@lifeintegrity.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: LSISAS1068E + WDC WD2002FYPS: I/O error & Sense Key
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:15:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1249316158.3943.54.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090803160629.GA2011@lifeintegrity.com>
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 12:06 -0400, Allan Wind wrote:
> On 2009-08-03T09:34:53, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 01:08 -0400, Allan Wind wrote:
> > >
> > > The above complains about sector 3907028974 which is exactly
> > > 19566 sectors greater than the size of the raid array according
> > > to parted. In other words it appears to be an access to the last
> > > sector of the array.
> >
> > If it's a read beyond the end of a partition, then it's possible it got
> > rejected in the partition checking logic before ever reaching the I/O
> > controller (which would explain why no messages from the fusion in the
> > log).
> >
> > However, I don't think the analysis is correct. Parted says
> >
> >
> > > Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
> > > 1 34s 19565s 19532s bios_grub
> > > 2 19566s 3907029134s 3907009569s ext3 raid
> >
> > So the absolute sector number 3907028974 is within partition 2.
>
> I was actually trying to make a different point. Namely that it
> was curious that the error message complains about sector
> 3907028974 which is exactly the size of the array + 19566, or in
> other words 1 sector past the end of array:
That's where md stores its superblock ... but it's still within the
partition.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-03 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090727060322.GB27002@lifeintegrity.com>
[not found] ` <4A70A64A.2070605@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20090729200714.GA20706@lifeintegrity.com>
2009-07-29 23:04 ` LSISAS1068E + WDC WD2002FYPS: I/O error & Sense Key Robert Hancock
2009-07-31 18:40 ` Allan Wind
2009-08-03 5:08 ` Allan Wind
2009-08-03 14:34 ` James Bottomley
2009-08-03 16:06 ` Allan Wind
2009-08-03 16:15 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2009-08-26 21:17 ` Allan Wind
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1249316158.3943.54.camel@mulgrave.site \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=allan_wind@lifeintegrity.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox