From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vasu Dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] RFC: handle queue_depth adjustments because of QUEUE_FULLs in scsi_error.c Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:01:17 -0700 Message-ID: <1251914477.29277.101.camel@vi2.jf.intel.com> References: <20090826180234.23396.8148.stgit@vi1.jf.intel.com> <1251845853.27437.69.camel@vi2.jf.intel.com> <4A9DCE5D.2040208@cs.wisc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga10.intel.com ([192.55.52.92]:10604 "EHLO fmsmga102.fm.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752131AbZIBSBO (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:01:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A9DCE5D.2040208@cs.wisc.edu> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Christie , Christof Schmitt Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 20:46 -0500, Mike Christie wrote: > On 09/01/2009 05:57 PM, Vasu Dev wrote: > You should just post your patches with mine. I do not have time to test > my stuff right now with the current kernel, and since you need them and > are going to have to test your patches just make it easy for > James/reviewers and send it all in one patchset so people do not have to > search for dependencies. > > For my patches just add your signed off after mine, since you are > sending them and I had written them. I'll get them out as per by your suggestions above, thanks. > > You can/should probably also pick up Christop's stuff too for him (zfcp > patches). Christof, I'm fine picking up your patch also, let me know if that is not fine with you. Thanks Vasu