From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
To: "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@lsi.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
"michaelc@cs.wisc.edu" <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
"Benoit_Arthur@emc.com" <Benoit_Arthur@emc.com>,
"Eddie.Williams@steeleye.com" <Eddie.Williams@steeleye.com>,
"berthiaume_wayne@emc.com" <berthiaume_wayne@emc.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/4] scsi_dh: rdac handler: Make rdac hardware handler async
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:29:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1254443360.24692.21.camel@chandra-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E463DF2B2E584B4A82673F53D62C2EF474E786BE@cosmail01.lsi.com>
Thanks Babu,
It matches with what I was seeing too.
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 18:03 -0600, Moger, Babu wrote:
> Hi Chandra,
> I have tested these patches on 2.6.31 kernel with LSI storage.
> My configuration had 234 Luns with two paths to each lun(one active, one passive) and luns were evenly distributed.
> Here are the results.
>
> Results with the patches
> Failover takes about 1 minute to complete 117 mode selects. Failovers are completed in two sets(1 mode select first and then 116 mode selects together).
> Failback takes about 2 and Half minutes..
>
>
> Results without the patches on same configuration
> failover takes about 12 minutes to complete 117 mode selects.
> Failback takes about 15 minutes.
>
> Thanks
> Babu Moger
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-scsi-
> > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Chandra Seetharaman
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 9:08 PM
> > To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com; Moger, Babu; michaelc@cs.wisc.edu;
> > Benoit_Arthur@emc.com; Eddie.Williams@steeleye.com;
> > berthiaume_wayne@emc.com; Chandra Seetharaman
> > Subject: [PATCH 2/4] scsi_dh: rdac handler: Make rdac hardware handler
> > async
> >
> > Batch up MODE_SELECT in rdac device handler.
> >
> > LSI RDAC storage has the capability of handling mode selects for
> > multiple luns in a same command. Make use of that ability to send
> > as few MODE SELECTs as possible to the storage controller as possible.
> >
> > This patch creates a work queue and queues up activate requests
> > when a MODE SELECT is sent down the wire. When that MODE SELECT
> > completes, it compiles queued up activate requests for multiple
> > luns into a single MODE SELECT.
> >
> > This reduces the time to do failover/failback of large number of LUNS.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@lsi.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c | 117
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.31/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.31.orig/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c
> > +++ linux-2.6.31/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> > #include <scsi/scsi.h>
> > #include <scsi/scsi_eh.h>
> > #include <scsi/scsi_dh.h>
> > +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> >
> > #define RDAC_NAME "rdac"
> > #define RDAC_RETRY_COUNT 5
> > @@ -135,6 +136,11 @@ struct rdac_controller {
> > struct rdac_pg_legacy legacy;
> > struct rdac_pg_expanded expanded;
> > } mode_select;
> > + spinlock_t ms_lock;
> > + int ms_queued;
> > + struct work_struct ms_work;
> > + struct scsi_device *ms_sdev;
> > + struct list_head ms_head;
> > };
> > struct c8_inquiry {
> > u8 peripheral_info;
> > @@ -195,8 +201,17 @@ static const char *lun_state[] =
> > "owned (AVT mode)",
> > };
> >
> > +struct rdac_queue_data {
> > + struct list_head entry;
> > + struct rdac_dh_data *h;
> > + activate_complete callback_fn;
> > + void *callback_data;
> > +};
> > +
> > static LIST_HEAD(ctlr_list);
> > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(list_lock);
> > +static struct workqueue_struct *kmpath_rdacd;
> > +static void send_mode_select(struct work_struct *work);
> >
> > static inline struct rdac_dh_data *get_rdac_data(struct scsi_device
> > *sdev)
> > {
> > @@ -253,7 +268,6 @@ static struct request *rdac_failover_get
> > rdac_pg->subpage_code = 0x1;
> > rdac_pg->page_len[0] = 0x01;
> > rdac_pg->page_len[1] = 0x28;
> > - rdac_pg->lun_table[h->lun] = 0x81;
> > } else {
> > struct rdac_pg_legacy *rdac_pg;
> >
> > @@ -263,7 +277,6 @@ static struct request *rdac_failover_get
> > common = &rdac_pg->common;
> > rdac_pg->page_code = RDAC_PAGE_CODE_REDUNDANT_CONTROLLER;
> > rdac_pg->page_len = 0x68;
> > - rdac_pg->lun_table[h->lun] = 0x81;
> > }
> > common->rdac_mode[1] = RDAC_MODE_TRANSFER_SPECIFIED_LUNS;
> > common->quiescence_timeout = RDAC_QUIESCENCE_TIME;
> > @@ -297,6 +310,7 @@ static void release_controller(struct kr
> > struct rdac_controller *ctlr;
> > ctlr = container_of(kref, struct rdac_controller, kref);
> >
> > + flush_workqueue(kmpath_rdacd);
> > spin_lock(&list_lock);
> > list_del(&ctlr->node);
> > spin_unlock(&list_lock);
> > @@ -326,6 +340,11 @@ static struct rdac_controller *get_contr
> > memcpy(ctlr->slot_id, slot_id, SLOT_ID_LEN);
> > kref_init(&ctlr->kref);
> > ctlr->use_ms10 = -1;
> > + ctlr->ms_queued = 0;
> > + ctlr->ms_sdev = NULL;
> > + spin_lock_init(&ctlr->ms_lock);
> > + INIT_WORK(&ctlr->ms_work, send_mode_select);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctlr->ms_head);
> > list_add(&ctlr->node, &ctlr_list);
> > done:
> > spin_unlock(&list_lock);
> > @@ -445,8 +464,7 @@ static int set_mode_select(struct scsi_d
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > -static int mode_select_handle_sense(struct scsi_device *sdev,
> > - unsigned char *sensebuf)
> > +static int mode_select_handle_sense(unsigned char *sensebuf)
> > {
> > struct scsi_sense_hdr sense_hdr;
> > int err = SCSI_DH_IO, ret;
> > @@ -478,7 +496,7 @@ static int mode_select_handle_sense(stru
> > err = SCSI_DH_RETRY;
> > break;
> > default:
> > - sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev,
> > + printk(KERN_INFO
> > "MODE_SELECT failed with sense
> > %02x/%02x/%02x.\n",
> > sense_hdr.sense_key, sense_hdr.asc,
> > sense_hdr.ascq);
> > }
> > @@ -487,11 +505,29 @@ done:
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > -static int send_mode_select(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct
> > rdac_dh_data *h)
> > +static void send_mode_select(struct work_struct *work)
> > {
> > + struct rdac_controller *ctlr =
> > + container_of(work, struct rdac_controller, ms_work);
> > struct request *rq;
> > + struct scsi_device *sdev = ctlr->ms_sdev;
> > + struct rdac_dh_data *h = get_rdac_data(sdev);
> > struct request_queue *q = sdev->request_queue;
> > int err, retry_cnt = RDAC_RETRY_COUNT;
> > + struct rdac_queue_data *tmp, *qdata;
> > + LIST_HEAD(list);
> > + u8 *lun_table;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&ctlr->ms_lock);
> > + list_splice_init(&ctlr->ms_head, &list);
> > + ctlr->ms_queued = 0;
> > + ctlr->ms_sdev = NULL;
> > + spin_unlock(&ctlr->ms_lock);
> > +
> > + if (ctlr->use_ms10)
> > + lun_table = ctlr->mode_select.expanded.lun_table;
> > + else
> > + lun_table = ctlr->mode_select.legacy.lun_table;
> >
> > retry:
> > err = SCSI_DH_RES_TEMP_UNAVAIL;
> > @@ -499,13 +535,17 @@ retry:
> > if (!rq)
> > goto done;
> >
> > - sdev_printk(KERN_INFO, sdev, "%s MODE_SELECT command.\n",
> > + list_for_each_entry(qdata, &list, entry) {
> > + lun_table[qdata->h->lun] = 0x81;
> > + }
> > +
> > + printk(KERN_INFO "%s MODE_SELECT command.\n",
> > (retry_cnt == RDAC_RETRY_COUNT) ? "queueing" : "retrying");
> >
> > err = blk_execute_rq(q, NULL, rq, 1);
> > blk_put_request(rq);
> > if (err != SCSI_DH_OK) {
> > - err = mode_select_handle_sense(sdev, h->sense);
> > + err = mode_select_handle_sense(h->sense);
> > if (err == SCSI_DH_RETRY && retry_cnt--)
> > goto retry;
> > }
> > @@ -513,10 +553,45 @@ retry:
> > h->state = RDAC_STATE_ACTIVE;
> >
> > done:
> > - return err;
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(qdata, tmp, &list, entry) {
> > + list_del(&qdata->entry);
> > + if (err == SCSI_DH_OK)
> > + qdata->h->state = RDAC_STATE_ACTIVE;
> > + if (qdata->callback_fn)
> > + qdata->callback_fn(qdata->callback_data, err);
> > + kfree(qdata);
> > + }
> > + return;
> > }
> >
> > -static int rdac_activate(struct scsi_device *sdev, activate_complete
> > fn, void *data)
> > +static int queue_mode_select(struct scsi_device *sdev,
> > + activate_complete fn, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct rdac_queue_data *qdata;
> > + struct rdac_controller *ctlr;
> > +
> > + qdata = kzalloc(sizeof(*qdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!qdata)
> > + return SCSI_DH_RETRY;
> > +
> > + qdata->h = get_rdac_data(sdev);
> > + qdata->callback_fn = fn;
> > + qdata->callback_data = data;
> > +
> > + ctlr = qdata->h->ctlr;
> > + spin_lock(&ctlr->ms_lock);
> > + list_add_tail(&qdata->entry, &ctlr->ms_head);
> > + if (!ctlr->ms_queued) {
> > + ctlr->ms_queued = 1;
> > + ctlr->ms_sdev = sdev;
> > + queue_work(kmpath_rdacd, &ctlr->ms_work);
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock(&ctlr->ms_lock);
> > + return SCSI_DH_OK;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int rdac_activate(struct scsi_device *sdev,
> > + activate_complete fn, void *data)
> > {
> > struct rdac_dh_data *h = get_rdac_data(sdev);
> > int err = SCSI_DH_OK;
> > @@ -536,8 +611,11 @@ static int rdac_activate(struct scsi_dev
> > if (err != SCSI_DH_OK)
> > goto done;
> > }
> > - if (h->lun_state == RDAC_LUN_UNOWNED)
> > - err = send_mode_select(sdev, h);
> > + if (h->lun_state == RDAC_LUN_UNOWNED) {
> > + err = queue_mode_select(sdev, fn, data);
> > + if (err == SCSI_DH_OK)
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > done:
> > if (fn)
> > fn(data, err);
> > @@ -726,13 +804,26 @@ static int __init rdac_init(void)
> > int r;
> >
> > r = scsi_register_device_handler(&rdac_dh);
> > - if (r != 0)
> > + if (r != 0) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to register scsi device handler.");
> > + goto done;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Create workqueue to handle mode selects for rdac
> > + */
> > + kmpath_rdacd = create_singlethread_workqueue("kmpath_rdacd");
> > + if (!kmpath_rdacd) {
> > + scsi_unregister_device_handler(&rdac_dh);
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "kmpath_rdacd creation failed.\n");
> > + }
> > +done:
> > return r;
> > }
> >
> > static void __exit rdac_exit(void)
> > {
> > + destroy_workqueue(kmpath_rdacd);
> > scsi_unregister_device_handler(&rdac_dh);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi"
> > in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-02 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-30 2:08 [PATCH 0/4] scsi_dh: Make scsi_dh_activate asynchronous Chandra Seetharaman
2009-09-30 2:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] scsi_dh: Change the scsidh_activate interface to be asynchronous Chandra Seetharaman
2009-10-02 22:04 ` Moger, Babu
2009-10-02 22:36 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-10-02 23:02 ` Moger, Babu
2009-09-30 2:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] scsi_dh: rdac handler: Make rdac hardware handler async Chandra Seetharaman
2009-10-02 0:03 ` Moger, Babu
2009-10-02 0:29 ` Chandra Seetharaman [this message]
2009-09-30 2:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] scsi_dh: rdac handler: Make hp " Chandra Seetharaman
2009-09-30 2:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] scsi_dh: rdac handler: Make alua " Chandra Seetharaman
2009-10-01 4:19 ` [PATCH 0/4] scsi_dh: Make scsi_dh_activate asynchronous Moger, Babu
2009-10-01 20:54 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-10-05 13:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-10-05 14:35 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-10-05 23:25 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-10-06 8:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-10-06 19:46 ` Moger, Babu
2009-10-07 23:08 ` Moger, Babu
2009-10-09 9:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-10-09 14:06 ` Moger, Babu
2009-10-09 14:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1254443360.24692.21.camel@chandra-ubuntu \
--to=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=Babu.Moger@lsi.com \
--cc=Benoit_Arthur@emc.com \
--cc=Eddie.Williams@steeleye.com \
--cc=berthiaume_wayne@emc.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=sekharan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox