[PATCH 1/1] RFC: scsi/dm-mpath: return -EACCES on reservation conflict

[michaelc@cs.wisc.edu]

From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>

This patch was made over this patch
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=125417106125449&w=2

The basic problem is that we do not want dm-multipath to retry
this error, but the scsi layer returns -EIO or -EILSEQ, so
dm-multipath cannot distinguish between a reservation conflict
and other errors.

This problem was originally discussed here
http://www.linux-archive.org/device-mapper-development/180290-dm-mpath-scsi-persistent-reservation.html

I have considered adding new blk error values (I have sent pactches
for this before and can send updated ones if we want to go this route),
and even just using more -EXYZ values for scsi errors, but in the end I am
just not sure it ended up being worth it, so this patch just
handles the one error.

The problem with adding new blk errors is that it seems only dm-multipath
knows what it wants (have not seen anything from the FS or RAID people),
and I also do not know what every device is sending so I cannot completely
clean up cases like where a device returns a error (check condition
and sense) indicating a controller port is temporarily unavialable.
For example, I do not know if I am getting a ILLEGAL request for some
non retryable device error vs the controller is getting its FW updated
(for a non retryable device error case we do not want to fail the path
and just want to fail the IO, but for FW update we just want to fail
the path), so I have to treat those device errors like a transport error
and just fail the path.

So, I did another take just using lots of different -EXYZ values. See
this patch

for an example. The problem is still that the transport error
and generic error cases are the same so all I bought was the handling
of the reservation conflict.

And, that is how I ended up here where I am only handling the one
error I know for sure will cause problems with the infrastructure we have.
I am  not in love with this patch, so please give me any other
suggestions.

Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
---
 drivers/md/dm-mpath.c   |    2 +-
 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c |    4 ++++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
index 32d0b87..93e6ce5 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
@@ -1214,7 +1214,7 @@ static int do_end_io(struct multipath *m, struct request *clone,
 	if (!error && !clone->errors)
 		return 0;	/* I/O complete */
 
-	if (error == -EOPNOTSUPP)
+	if (error == -EOPNOTSUPP || error == -EACCES)
 		return error;
 
 	if (mpio->pgpath)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 1086552..5635035 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -797,6 +797,10 @@ void scsi_io_completion(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, unsigned int good_bytes)
 		 * happens.
 		 */
 		action = ACTION_RETRY;
+	else if (status_byte(cmd->result) == RESERVATION_CONFLICT) {
+		error = -EACCES;
+		description = "Could not access device";
+		action = ACTION_FAIL;
 	} else if (sense_valid && !sense_deferred) {
 		switch (sshdr.sense_key) {
 		case UNIT_ATTENTION:
-- 
1.6.2.2