From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: be2iscsi: Bug Fixes Needed Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:30:14 -0600 Message-ID: <1263753014.2802.1.camel@mulgrave.site> References: <20100106201918.GA19887@serverengines.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:60702 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753169Ab0AQSaX (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Jan 2010 13:30:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20100106201918.GA19887@serverengines.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jayamohan Kalickal Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 01:49 +0530, Jayamohan Kallickal wrote: > Hi James > > These patches contains some bug fixes that are important for > the driver. This phraseology usually means apply to the linus kernel now. > These patches are created using the latest scsi-misc tree and after > applying the following patches sent earlier > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg41363.html > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg41364.html However, these are an enhancement stream for the kernel. So I'm assuming these aren't essential bug fixes, but can wait until the next merge window? If not, they need to be made against current upstream (because they won't apply without the updates patches). James