linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
To: George Kadianakis <desnacked@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, james.smart@emulex.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] SCSI: lpfc, restore MSI-X/MSI support
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 12:47:32 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1263754052.2802.2.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r5pta66n.fsf@gmail.com>

On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 02:20 +0200, George Kadianakis wrote:
> From: George Kadianakis <desnacked {bomb} gmail {point} com>
> 
> A Gentoo bug report [1] showed that as of 2.6.31 lpfc only uses INTx interrupts.
> This patch restores lpfc's ability to support MSI-X/MSI interrupts that the 
> "Addition of SLI4 Interface - Base Support" patch [2] broke.
> It reestablishes MSI-X as the default interrupt method and in case MSI-X is not 
> supported lpfc_sli{4,}_enable_intr fallbacks to MSI and then to INTx.
> 
> [1]: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=296319
> [2]: commit da0436e915a5c17ee79e72c1bf978a4ebb1cbf4d

So now I have an ack for this, I need an applyable patch.

> Signed-off-by:  George Kadianakis <desnacked {cat} gmail {dog} com>

This needs to be a proper email

>  drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c |    6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c
> index e1a30a1..936ecaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_attr.c
> @@ -2890,12 +2890,12 @@ LPFC_ATTR_RW(poll_tmo, 10, 1, 255,
>  /*
>  # lpfc_use_msi: Use MSI (Message Signaled Interrupts) in systems that
>  # 				 support this feature
> -#       0  = MSI disabled (default)
> +#       0  = MSI disabled
>  #       1  = MSI enabled
> -#       2  = MSI-X enabled
> +#       2  = MSI-X enabled (default)
>  # Value range is [0,2]. Default value is 0.
>  */
> -LPFC_ATTR_R(use_msi, 0, 0, 2, "Use Message Signaled Interrupts (1) or "
> +LPFC_ATTR_R(use_msi, 2, 0, 2, "Use Message Signaled Interrupts (1) or "
>  					      "MSI-X (2), if possible");
>  
>  /*

And for some reason there are extra tabs in the above lines which cause
patch to reject.

James



  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-17 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-14  0:20 [PATCH 1/1] SCSI: lpfc, restore MSI-X/MSI support George Kadianakis
2010-01-14 17:03 ` James Smart
2010-01-14 17:26   ` George Kadianakis
2010-01-14 22:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-17 18:47 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2010-01-17 19:19   ` George Kadianakis
2010-01-18 14:48     ` Rolf Eike Beer
2010-01-18 18:06       ` George Kadianakis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1263754052.2802.2.camel@mulgrave.site \
    --to=james.bottomley@suse.de \
    --cc=desnacked@gmail.com \
    --cc=james.smart@emulex.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).