From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: scsi: convert discard to REQ_TYPE_FS instead of REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:07:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1278475646.15869.3.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100707004748.GA3068@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 20:47 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06 2010 at 7:40pm -0400,
> Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com> wrote:
>
> > On 10-07-06 05:31 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > >On Tue, Jul 06 2010 at 3:01am -0400,
> > >FUJITA Tomonori<fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> > >
> > >>I confirmed that mkfs.xfs worked with Intel X25-M (trim) and
> > >>scsi_debug (write same and unmap).
> > >>
> > >>REQ_TYPE_FS should give the same scsi_cmnd struct as REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC.
> > >>
> > >>This can be applied to block's for-2.6.36.
> > >>
> > >>The git tree is also available:
> > >>
> > >>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tomo/linux-2.6-misc.git fs-discard
> > >>
> > >>=
> > >>From: FUJITA Tomonori<fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> > >>Subject: [PATCH] scsi: convert discard to REQ_TYPE_FS instead of REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC
> > >>
> > >>The block layer (file systems) sends discard requests as REQ_TYPE_FS
> > >>(the role of REQ_TYPE_FS is that setting up commands and interpreting
> > >>the results). But SCSI-ml treats discard requests as
> > >>REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC.
> > >>
> > >>scsi-ml can handle discard requests as REQ_TYPE_FS
> > >>easily. scsi_setup_discard_cmnd() sets up struct request and the bio
> > >>nicely. Only remaining issue is that discard requests can't be
> > >>completed partially so we need to modify sd_done.
> > >>
> > >>This conversion also fixes the problem that discard requests aren't
> > >>retried when possible (e.g. UNIT ATTENTION).
> > >>
> > >>Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori<fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> > >
> > >Unfortunately this patch causes 'mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/sda' to fail against
> > >a device whose discard support is implemented using WRITE SAME 16 w/
> > >discard bit set. This is with recent e2fsprogs that issues BLKDISCARD
> > >ioctl at start of mkfs:
> > >
> > >sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
> > >sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Sense Key : Illegal Request [current]
> > >Info fld=0x0
> > >sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Add. Sense: Parameter value invalid
> > >sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] CDB: Write same(16): 93 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 7f ff ff 00 00
> > >end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 0
> >
> > That is 0x7fffff (over 8 million) blocks (4 GB) being unmapped
> > in one operation! That may exceed the "maximum unmap lba
> > count" field in the Block Limits VPD page.
> > The latest SBC draft (sbc3r22.pdf) says that field applies to
> > the SCSI UNMAP command and does not mention the WRITE SAME (16)
> > command but that is probably an oversight.
>
> # sg_inq -p 0xb0 /dev/sda
> VPD INQUIRY: Block limits page (SBC)
> Optimal transfer length granularity: 8 blocks
> Maximum transfer length: 8388607 blocks
I'll lay reasonable odds this is the problem. The standard doesn't
mention WRITE SAME for this transfer length limit, but nor does it
mention WRITE LONG ... I bet they both fail when over this.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-07 4:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-06 7:01 [PATCH] scsi: convert discard to REQ_TYPE_FS instead of REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC FUJITA Tomonori
2010-07-06 21:31 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-07-06 23:40 ` Douglas Gilbert
2010-07-07 0:47 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-07-07 1:39 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-07-07 2:19 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-07-07 3:35 ` Douglas Gilbert
2010-07-08 19:11 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-07-09 16:27 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-07-09 18:06 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-07-09 16:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-07-07 4:06 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-07-07 4:07 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2010-07-07 16:39 ` [PATCH] " Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-08 0:40 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2010-07-08 14:35 ` James Bottomley
2010-07-09 3:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-09 4:42 ` FUJITA Tomonori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1278475646.15869.3.camel@mulgrave.site \
--to=james.bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).