From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Fwd: Re: linuxcon 2010...
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:27:23 -0400
Message-ID: <1283772443.15944.1320.camel@mulgrave.site>
References: <4C76CA57.3050405@vlnb.net>
	 <1282857806.32007.175.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
	 <4C79484B.3090607@vlnb.net>
	 <1283028468.32007.357.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
	 <4C7C18CE.5020103@vlnb.net>
	 <1283204792.32007.448.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
	 <4C7FFD1A.8090509@vlnb.net>
	 <1283459158.5598.143.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
	 <20100905201802.GC18411@core.coreip.homeip.net>
	 <1283723447.556.133.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
	 <20100905234134.GA17212@core.coreip.homeip.net>
	 <1283731194.556.147.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
	 <1283769578.15944.1293.camel@mulgrave.site>
	 <AANLkTikaE=7++X1VQj36Np93msyCViLs40_ti_2=ybqn@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48067 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754491Ab0IFL13 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 6 Sep 2010 07:27:29 -0400
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikaE=7++X1VQj36Np93msyCViLs40_ti_2=ybqn@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Chetan Loke <chetanloke@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>, scst-devel <scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>

On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 13:02 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:39 PM, James Bottomley
> <James.Bottomley@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > > So, please understand that code and project workflow is only one of the
> > > reasons why TCM/LIO v4 was selected over SCST.
> >
> > It isn't yet ... your code still has to be reviewed properly.  My
> > preferred reviewer is currently honing his skills on a diet of raw beef
> > in Argentina, but hopefully he'll get around to it shortly.
> 
> The SCST developers and the SCST users will definitely appreciate it
> if review efforts will be spread evenly over both projects.

SCST isn't at the starting gate yet, so there's nothing currently to
review.

James