public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Moore <Eric.Moore@lsi.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, vasu.dev@intel.com,
	ak@linux.intel.com, willy@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi, mptsas : drop scsi_host lock when calling mptsas_qcmd
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:48:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1284670136.13344.93.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284666254.7280.54.camel@schen9-DESK>

On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 12:44 -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> During testing of FFSB benchmark (configured with 
> 128 threaded write to 128 files on 16 SSD), scsi_host lock was 
> heavily contended, accounting for 23.7% of cpu cycles.  There
> are 64 cores in our test system and the JBOD
> is connected with a mptsas HBA.  Taking a similar approach
> as the patch by Vasu (http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.scsi.open-fcoe.devel/10110)
> for Fiber Channel adapter, the following patch on 2.6.35 kernel 
> avoids taking the scsi host lock when queueing mptsas scsi command. We see
> a big drop in the cpu cycles contending for the lock (from 23.7% to 1.8%).  
> The number of IO per sec increase by 10.6% from 62.9K per sec to 69.6K per sec.
> 
> If there is no good reason to prevent mptsas_qcmd from being 
> executed in parallel, we should remove this lock from the queue 
> command code path.  Other adapters probably can
> benefit in a similar manner.
> 
> 
>                         %cpu cycles contending host lock
>                         2.6.35		2.6.35+patch
> -----------------------------------------------------
> scsi_dispatch_cmd       5.5%		0.44%
> scsi_device_unbusy      6.1%		0.66%
> scsi_request_fn         6.6%		0.35%
> scsi_run_queue          5.5%		0.35%
> 
> 

Hi Tim and Co,

Many Thanks for posting these very interesting numbers with
unlocked_qcmds=1 + mpt-fusion SCSI LLD on a 64-core system..  Wow.. 8-)

I asked James about getting Vasu's unlocked_qcmds=1 patch merged, but he
convinced me that doing conditional locking while is very simple, is not
the proper way for getting this resolved in mainline code.  I think in
the end this will require a longer sit down to do a wholesale conversion
of all existing SCSI LLD drivers, and identifing the broken ones that
still need a struct Scsi_Host->host_lock'ed SHT->queuecommand() for
whatever strange & legacy reasons.

While there are still some outstanding TCM items that need to be
resolved in the next days, I am very interested to help make the
wholesale host_lock + ->queuecomamnd() conversion happen.  I will get a
lio-core-2.6.git branch setup for this purpose on .36-rc4 soon and start
working on the main SCSI Mid-layer conversion pieces sometime next week.
I am very eager to accept patches on a per LLD basis for this work, and
will be starting with the open-fcoe initiator, TCM_Loop, mpt2sas, and
open-iscsi.

I think the wholesole conversion is going to be pretty straight-forward,
and at least with the main SCSI LLDs (that we really care about ;) there
appear to be no immediate issues with a full conversion.

Best,

--nab


> Tim Chen
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c b/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
> index ac000e8..ab3aab9 100644
> --- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
> +++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
> @@ -4984,6 +4984,8 @@ mptsas_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>  	sh->max_lun = max_lun;
>  	sh->transportt = mptsas_transport_template;
>  
> +	sh->unlocked_qcmds = 1;
> +
>  	/* Required entry.
>  	 */
>  	sh->unique_id = ioc->id;
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> index ad0ed21..3819d66 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> @@ -749,11 +749,16 @@ int scsi_dispatch_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>  	if (unlikely(host->shost_state == SHOST_DEL)) {
>  		cmd->result = (DID_NO_CONNECT << 16);
>  		scsi_done(cmd);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
>  	} else {
>  		trace_scsi_dispatch_cmd_start(cmd);
> +		if (host->unlocked_qcmds)
> +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
>  		rtn = host->hostt->queuecommand(cmd, scsi_done);
> +		if (!host->unlocked_qcmds)
> +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
>  	}
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
> +
>  	if (rtn) {
>  		trace_scsi_dispatch_cmd_error(cmd, rtn);
>  		if (rtn != SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY &&
> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> index b7bdecb..1814c51 100644
> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> @@ -636,6 +636,9 @@ struct Scsi_Host {
>  	/* Asynchronous scan in progress */
>  	unsigned async_scan:1;
>  
> +	/* call queuecommand without Scsi_Host lock held */
> +	unsigned unlocked_qcmds:1;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Optional work queue to be utilized by the transport
>  	 */
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-16 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-16 19:44 [PATCH] scsi, mptsas : drop scsi_host lock when calling mptsas_qcmd Tim Chen
2010-09-16 20:48 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
2010-09-16 21:18   ` Tim Chen
2010-09-16 21:25   ` Andi Kleen
2010-09-16 21:24     ` James Bottomley
2010-09-16 23:25       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-17  0:13         ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-17  1:12           ` Vasu Dev
2010-09-16 21:34     ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-16 21:44       ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-16 21:48         ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-16 22:00     ` Joe Eykholt
2010-09-16 22:16       ` James Bottomley
2010-09-17  7:16         ` Andi Kleen
2010-09-17 10:32           ` Bart Van Assche
2010-09-17 12:19             ` James Bottomley
2010-09-16 22:26       ` Tim Chen
2010-09-16 21:31   ` Vasu Dev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1284670136.13344.93.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org \
    --to=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    --cc=Eric.Moore@lsi.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vasu.dev@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox