From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Moore <Eric.Moore@lsi.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, vasu.dev@intel.com,
ak@linux.intel.com, willy@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi, mptsas : drop scsi_host lock when calling mptsas_qcmd
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:48:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1284670136.13344.93.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284666254.7280.54.camel@schen9-DESK>
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 12:44 -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> During testing of FFSB benchmark (configured with
> 128 threaded write to 128 files on 16 SSD), scsi_host lock was
> heavily contended, accounting for 23.7% of cpu cycles. There
> are 64 cores in our test system and the JBOD
> is connected with a mptsas HBA. Taking a similar approach
> as the patch by Vasu (http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.scsi.open-fcoe.devel/10110)
> for Fiber Channel adapter, the following patch on 2.6.35 kernel
> avoids taking the scsi host lock when queueing mptsas scsi command. We see
> a big drop in the cpu cycles contending for the lock (from 23.7% to 1.8%).
> The number of IO per sec increase by 10.6% from 62.9K per sec to 69.6K per sec.
>
> If there is no good reason to prevent mptsas_qcmd from being
> executed in parallel, we should remove this lock from the queue
> command code path. Other adapters probably can
> benefit in a similar manner.
>
>
> %cpu cycles contending host lock
> 2.6.35 2.6.35+patch
> -----------------------------------------------------
> scsi_dispatch_cmd 5.5% 0.44%
> scsi_device_unbusy 6.1% 0.66%
> scsi_request_fn 6.6% 0.35%
> scsi_run_queue 5.5% 0.35%
>
>
Hi Tim and Co,
Many Thanks for posting these very interesting numbers with
unlocked_qcmds=1 + mpt-fusion SCSI LLD on a 64-core system.. Wow.. 8-)
I asked James about getting Vasu's unlocked_qcmds=1 patch merged, but he
convinced me that doing conditional locking while is very simple, is not
the proper way for getting this resolved in mainline code. I think in
the end this will require a longer sit down to do a wholesale conversion
of all existing SCSI LLD drivers, and identifing the broken ones that
still need a struct Scsi_Host->host_lock'ed SHT->queuecommand() for
whatever strange & legacy reasons.
While there are still some outstanding TCM items that need to be
resolved in the next days, I am very interested to help make the
wholesale host_lock + ->queuecomamnd() conversion happen. I will get a
lio-core-2.6.git branch setup for this purpose on .36-rc4 soon and start
working on the main SCSI Mid-layer conversion pieces sometime next week.
I am very eager to accept patches on a per LLD basis for this work, and
will be starting with the open-fcoe initiator, TCM_Loop, mpt2sas, and
open-iscsi.
I think the wholesole conversion is going to be pretty straight-forward,
and at least with the main SCSI LLDs (that we really care about ;) there
appear to be no immediate issues with a full conversion.
Best,
--nab
> Tim Chen
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c b/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
> index ac000e8..ab3aab9 100644
> --- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
> +++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
> @@ -4984,6 +4984,8 @@ mptsas_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> sh->max_lun = max_lun;
> sh->transportt = mptsas_transport_template;
>
> + sh->unlocked_qcmds = 1;
> +
> /* Required entry.
> */
> sh->unique_id = ioc->id;
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> index ad0ed21..3819d66 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> @@ -749,11 +749,16 @@ int scsi_dispatch_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> if (unlikely(host->shost_state == SHOST_DEL)) {
> cmd->result = (DID_NO_CONNECT << 16);
> scsi_done(cmd);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
> } else {
> trace_scsi_dispatch_cmd_start(cmd);
> + if (host->unlocked_qcmds)
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
> rtn = host->hostt->queuecommand(cmd, scsi_done);
> + if (!host->unlocked_qcmds)
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
> }
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(host->host_lock, flags);
> +
> if (rtn) {
> trace_scsi_dispatch_cmd_error(cmd, rtn);
> if (rtn != SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY &&
> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> index b7bdecb..1814c51 100644
> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> @@ -636,6 +636,9 @@ struct Scsi_Host {
> /* Asynchronous scan in progress */
> unsigned async_scan:1;
>
> + /* call queuecommand without Scsi_Host lock held */
> + unsigned unlocked_qcmds:1;
> +
> /*
> * Optional work queue to be utilized by the transport
> */
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-16 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-16 19:44 [PATCH] scsi, mptsas : drop scsi_host lock when calling mptsas_qcmd Tim Chen
2010-09-16 20:48 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
2010-09-16 21:18 ` Tim Chen
2010-09-16 21:25 ` Andi Kleen
2010-09-16 21:24 ` James Bottomley
2010-09-16 23:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-17 0:13 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-17 1:12 ` Vasu Dev
2010-09-16 21:34 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-16 21:44 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-16 21:48 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-16 22:00 ` Joe Eykholt
2010-09-16 22:16 ` James Bottomley
2010-09-17 7:16 ` Andi Kleen
2010-09-17 10:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2010-09-17 12:19 ` James Bottomley
2010-09-16 22:26 ` Tim Chen
2010-09-16 21:31 ` Vasu Dev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1284670136.13344.93.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org \
--to=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=Eric.Moore@lsi.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vasu.dev@intel.com \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox