public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@linux.intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
	James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>,
	Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Drop host_lock around LLD SHT->queuecommand() caller
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:18:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1284679082.13344.117.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1284678103.13344.111.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>

On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 16:01 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 15:35 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> > 
> > Greetings all,
> > 
> > This series contains the first round of a whole-sale conversion for droping
> > struct Scsi_Host->host_lock around struct Scsi_Host->queuecommand() within
> > scsi_dispatch_cmd().  So with this first patch the only part of scsi_dispatch_cmd()
> > that is protected by host_lock is scsi_cmd_get_serial)_.
> > 
> > The patches #2 -> #8 converts libiscsi, libsas, lpfc, qla4xxx, qla2xxx,
> > TCM_Loop, and libfc code to drop their own SHT->queuecommand() internal
> > host_lock unlock() + lock() optimization that certain high performance libs
> > and LLDs have adopted over the years.  The changes involved here are really
> > quite straight forward, but please note that none of this code has been tested
> > with actual hardware yet, and is intended for generating comments for the relivent
> > SCSI LLD driver maintainers and other interested folks.
> > 
> > There are probably still be more LLDs which use this optimization, so please
> > let me know if there is another piece of SHT->queuecommand() caller code that
> > does this legacy optimization and needs to be updated.  I will be sure to
> > CC the right driver maintainers and CC linux-scsi as I come across any more
> > conversions.
> 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> drivers/scsi/fnic needs the conversion as well..  Here is that patch;
> 
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/nab/lio-core-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=3c886b2ab6faccbe2803094deb7a9647199e5118
> 

Ok, after doing some more digging the BusLogic and the ever important
libata SCSI glue code use the legacy host_lock unlock() -> do_work ->
lock() optimization as well.  Here are those patches (jgarzik CC'ed):

buslogic: Remove host_lock unlock() + lock() from BusLogic_QueueCommand()
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/nab/lio-core-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=b465dfeb8e6950faa9c074681c72ca0a6c21276c

libata: Remove host_lock unlock() + lock() from ata_scsi_queuecmd()
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/nab/lio-core-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=29f2ded8876910d7eb84e4d270188de6f8a8c8ee

Thanks!

--nab


  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-16 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-16 22:35 [PATCH 0/8] Drop host_lock around LLD SHT->queuecommand() caller Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-16 22:39 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-16 23:01 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-16 23:18   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
2010-09-16 23:26 ` Chetan Loke
2010-09-16 23:28   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-17  1:29 ` Tim Chen
2010-09-17  1:31   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-17 18:26     ` Jeff Garzik
2010-09-17 18:24       ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2010-09-17 19:01       ` Tim Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1284679082.13344.117.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org \
    --to=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.smart@emulex.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jeykholt@cisco.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vasu.dev@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox