From: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] lpfc 8.3.18: FC/FCoE Discovery fixes
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:05:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1287759951.11844.18.camel@wookie> (raw)
FC/FCoE Discovery fixes:
- Call the lpfc_drain_txq only for SLI4 hba
- In lpfc_cmpl_els_fdisc, fix code path that does not free IOCB.
- Treated firmware matching FCF property with different index as error
- Propagate error returns from lpfc_issue_els_flogi()
- Refactored lpfc_unregister_unused_fcf() to create a post
lpfc_dev_loss_tmo handler call for SLI-4 devices. Allows checking of
fcf after last ndlp released so that fcf can be released if no longer
in use.
- Replaced individual FCF_XXXX_DISC flag clearing in lieu of aggregate
FCF_DISCOVERY flag upon succesful completion of flogi.
- Correct setting of altBbCredit value in sparams to correct issue with
logins with remote loop-based devices.
Signed-off-by: Alex Iannicelli <alex.iannicelli@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
---
lpfc_els.c | 20 +++++++-------
lpfc_hbadisc.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
lpfc_init.c | 9 +++---
3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c 2010-10-11 12:32:22.000000000 -0400
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c 2010-10-21 22:37:34.000000000 -0400
@@ -523,12 +523,6 @@ lpfc_cmpl_els_flogi_fabric(struct lpfc_v
spin_lock_irq(shost->host_lock);
vport->fc_flag |= FC_PUBLIC_LOOP;
spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
- } else {
- /*
- * If we are a N-port connected to a Fabric, fixup sparam's so
- * logins to devices on remote loops work.
- */
- vport->fc_sparam.cmn.altBbCredit = 1;
}
vport->fc_myDID = irsp->un.ulpWord[4] & Mask_DID;
@@ -1175,12 +1169,13 @@ lpfc_initial_flogi(struct lpfc_vport *vp
return 0;
}
- if (lpfc_issue_els_flogi(vport, ndlp, 0))
+ if (lpfc_issue_els_flogi(vport, ndlp, 0)) {
/* This decrement of reference count to node shall kick off
* the release of the node.
*/
lpfc_nlp_put(ndlp);
-
+ return 0;
+ }
return 1;
}
@@ -1645,6 +1640,13 @@ lpfc_issue_els_plogi(struct lpfc_vport *
memcpy(pcmd, &vport->fc_sparam, sizeof(struct serv_parm));
sp = (struct serv_parm *) pcmd;
+ /*
+ * If we are a N-port connected to a Fabric, fix-up paramm's so logins
+ * to device on remote loops work.
+ */
+ if ((vport->fc_flag & FC_FABRIC) && !(vport->fc_flag & FC_PUBLIC_LOOP))
+ sp->cmn.altBbCredit = 1;
+
if (sp->cmn.fcphLow < FC_PH_4_3)
sp->cmn.fcphLow = FC_PH_4_3;
@@ -6452,7 +6454,7 @@ lpfc_cmpl_els_fdisc(struct lpfc_hba *phb
* to update the MAC address.
*/
lpfc_register_new_vport(phba, vport, ndlp);
- return ;
+ goto out;
}
if (vport->fc_flag & FC_VPORT_NEEDS_INIT_VPI)
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c 2010-10-11 12:32:22.000000000 -0400
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c 2010-10-21 22:37:34.000000000 -0400
@@ -1803,6 +1803,16 @@ lpfc_mbx_cmpl_fcf_scan_read_fcf_rec(stru
if ((phba->fcf.fcf_flag & FCF_IN_USE) &&
lpfc_sli4_fcf_record_match(phba, &phba->fcf.current_rec,
new_fcf_record, LPFC_FCOE_IGNORE_VID)) {
+ if (bf_get(lpfc_fcf_record_fcf_index, new_fcf_record) !=
+ phba->fcf.current_rec.fcf_indx) {
+ lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_ERR, LOG_FIP,
+ "2862 FCF (x%x) matches property "
+ "of in-use FCF (x%x)\n",
+ bf_get(lpfc_fcf_record_fcf_index,
+ new_fcf_record),
+ phba->fcf.current_rec.fcf_indx);
+ goto read_next_fcf;
+ }
/*
* In case the current in-use FCF record becomes
* invalid/unavailable during FCF discovery that
@@ -1844,22 +1854,29 @@ lpfc_mbx_cmpl_fcf_scan_read_fcf_rec(stru
if (phba->fcf.fcf_flag & FCF_IN_USE) {
if (lpfc_sli4_fcf_record_match(phba, &phba->fcf.current_rec,
new_fcf_record, vlan_id)) {
- phba->fcf.fcf_flag |= FCF_AVAILABLE;
- if (phba->fcf.fcf_flag & FCF_REDISC_PEND)
- /* Stop FCF redisc wait timer if pending */
- __lpfc_sli4_stop_fcf_redisc_wait_timer(phba);
- else if (phba->fcf.fcf_flag & FCF_REDISC_FOV)
- /* If in fast failover, mark it's completed */
- phba->fcf.fcf_flag &= ~FCF_REDISC_FOV;
- spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
- lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_INFO, LOG_FIP,
- "2836 The new FCF record (x%x) "
- "matches the in-use FCF record "
- "(x%x)\n",
- phba->fcf.current_rec.fcf_indx,
+ if (bf_get(lpfc_fcf_record_fcf_index, new_fcf_record) ==
+ phba->fcf.current_rec.fcf_indx) {
+ phba->fcf.fcf_flag |= FCF_AVAILABLE;
+ if (phba->fcf.fcf_flag & FCF_REDISC_PEND)
+ /* Stop FCF redisc wait timer */
+ __lpfc_sli4_stop_fcf_redisc_wait_timer(
+ phba);
+ else if (phba->fcf.fcf_flag & FCF_REDISC_FOV)
+ /* Fast failover, mark completed */
+ phba->fcf.fcf_flag &= ~FCF_REDISC_FOV;
+ spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
+ lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_INFO, LOG_FIP,
+ "2836 New FCF matches in-use "
+ "FCF (x%x)\n",
+ phba->fcf.current_rec.fcf_indx);
+ goto out;
+ } else
+ lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_ERR, LOG_FIP,
+ "2863 New FCF (x%x) matches "
+ "property of in-use FCF (x%x)\n",
bf_get(lpfc_fcf_record_fcf_index,
- new_fcf_record));
- goto out;
+ new_fcf_record),
+ phba->fcf.current_rec.fcf_indx);
}
/*
* Read next FCF record from HBA searching for the matching
@@ -2069,28 +2086,6 @@ read_next_fcf:
LPFC_FCOE_FCF_GET_FIRST);
return;
}
-
- /*
- * Otherwise, initial scan or post linkdown rescan,
- * register with the best FCF record found so far
- * through the FCF scanning process.
- */
-
- /*
- * Mark the initial FCF discovery completed and
- * the start of the first round of the roundrobin
- * FCF failover.
- */
- spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
- phba->fcf.fcf_flag &=
- ~(FCF_INIT_DISC | FCF_REDISC_RRU);
- spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
- /*
- * Set up the initial registered FCF index for FLOGI
- * round robin FCF failover
- */
- phba->fcf.fcf_rr_init_indx =
- phba->fcf.current_rec.fcf_indx;
/* Register to the new FCF record */
lpfc_register_fcf(phba);
}
@@ -3992,6 +3987,16 @@ lpfc_cleanup_node(struct lpfc_vport *vpo
}
spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
+ /* Cleanup REG_LOGIN completions which are not yet processed */
+ list_for_each_entry(mb, &phba->sli.mboxq_cmpl, list) {
+ if ((mb->u.mb.mbxCommand != MBX_REG_LOGIN64) ||
+ (ndlp != (struct lpfc_nodelist *) mb->context2))
+ continue;
+
+ mb->context2 = NULL;
+ mb->mbox_cmpl = lpfc_sli_def_mbox_cmpl;
+ }
+
list_for_each_entry_safe(mb, nextmb, &phba->sli.mboxq, list) {
if ((mb->u.mb.mbxCommand == MBX_REG_LOGIN64) &&
(ndlp == (struct lpfc_nodelist *) mb->context2)) {
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c 2010-10-11 12:32:22.000000000 -0400
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c 2010-10-21 22:37:34.000000000 -0400
@@ -2234,10 +2234,9 @@ lpfc_stop_vport_timers(struct lpfc_vport
void
__lpfc_sli4_stop_fcf_redisc_wait_timer(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
{
- /* Clear pending FCF rediscovery wait and failover in progress flags */
- phba->fcf.fcf_flag &= ~(FCF_REDISC_PEND |
- FCF_DEAD_DISC |
- FCF_ACVL_DISC);
+ /* Clear pending FCF rediscovery wait flag */
+ phba->fcf.fcf_flag &= ~FCF_REDISC_PEND;
+
/* Now, try to stop the timer */
del_timer(&phba->fcf.redisc_wait);
}
@@ -2261,6 +2260,8 @@ lpfc_sli4_stop_fcf_redisc_wait_timer(str
return;
}
__lpfc_sli4_stop_fcf_redisc_wait_timer(phba);
+ /* Clear failover in progress flags */
+ phba->fcf.fcf_flag &= ~(FCF_DEAD_DISC | FCF_ACVL_DISC);
spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
}
reply other threads:[~2010-10-22 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1287759951.11844.18.camel@wookie \
--to=james.smart@emulex.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox