From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Subject: Re: [PATCH] target: fix compile failure in linux-next Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:52:04 -0800 Message-ID: <1293144724.4649.187.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> References: <1293036459.3019.46.camel@mulgrave.site> <1293144172.4649.177.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <1293144604.10141.20.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.linux-iscsi.org ([67.23.28.174]:50111 "EHLO linux-iscsi.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752290Ab0LWW57 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:57:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1293144604.10141.20.camel@mulgrave.site> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi , Stephen Rothwell On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:50 -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 14:42 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 10:47 -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > > > The interfaces open/close_bdev_exclusive are being eliminated in the > > > merge window. Fix by using the replacements. > > > > > > James > > > > > > > Hi James, > > > > If you don't mind I am going to let srf carry this patch for now, and I > > will begin a 'for-linux-next' branch to prevent future breakage from > > drivers/target/. > > It's already done. The point about postmerge trees is to fix this type > of thing. > Ahhh, thanks for the clarification here. I will try my best to prevent this type of conflict for linux-next in the future. Best Regards, --nab