From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
dgilbert@interlog.com, James Bottomley <jbottomley@suse.de>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jaxboe@fusionio.com,
michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, agk@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] scsi: Detailed I/O errors
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:41:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296168102.3050.83.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110127223525.GH14951@redhat.com>
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 17:35 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18 2011 at 7:01am -0500,
> Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > On 01/18/2011 12:33 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > This patchset is primarily for fixing up multipathing,
> > which has the habit of retrying failed I/Os on the
> > next path. For some errors this is just pointless
> > (eg MEDIUM ERROR), for some errors this is the desired
> > behaviour (namely transport errors), and for others
> > this is positively damaging (persistent reservation
> > failures).
> > Just plain EIO simply don't cover the whole range :-)
> >
> > >
> > > BTW might "vulgo" be "ergo" [Latin: therefore]?
> > >
> > Nope. Correct etymology is from 'sermo vulgaris',
> > ie the language of the common people.
> > But maybe I should remove it for the next
> > round to avoid confusion.
>
> Is a new round even needed given there haven't been any code issues
> raised against v4?
>
> James, what are your thoughts on this patchset? Would be great to get
> this in scsi-misc for 2.6.39
>
> Please advise,
Well, it covers three subsystems ... I was waiting for Alasdair and Jens
to ack ... but I bet they each were waiting for the other two to ack ...
So, I'll take it if no objections.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-27 22:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-18 9:13 [PATCH v4 0/3] differentiate between I/O errors Hannes Reinecke
2011-01-18 9:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] scsi: Detailed " Hannes Reinecke
2011-01-18 11:33 ` Douglas Gilbert
2011-01-18 12:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-01-27 22:35 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-27 22:41 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2011-01-27 22:54 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-01-28 8:12 ` Jens Axboe
2011-01-28 13:11 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2011-01-18 9:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] dm mpath: propagate target errors immediately Hannes Reinecke
2011-01-18 9:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] block: improve detail in I/O error messages Hannes Reinecke
2011-01-27 22:51 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1296168102.3050.83.camel@mulgrave.site \
--to=james.bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=jbottomley@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox