From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (target_core: rmmod GP fault)
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:44:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297284285.18212.71.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297283335.3016.48.camel@mulgrave.site>
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:28 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 12:20 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:13 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > Firstly, could we get the serious bug fixes identified and separated
> > > from the general enhancement updates, so they can go in a fixes tree
> > > without depending on enhancements? The former category would include
> > > the /proc interface removal, since we don't want the legacy interface to
> > > be in a released kernel.
> > >
> >
> > Everything in those two series should be considered bug fixes and
> > immediate for-38 mainline material.
>
> Things like this:
>
> target: remove EXTRA_CFLAGS
> target: Remove unnecessary container_of() pointer check
> target: Remove unnecessary se_clear_dev_ports legacy code
> target: Remove spurious double cast from structure macro accessors
> target: Convert TMR REQ/RSP definitions to target namespace
This is an important one, as using w/o TMR_* prefixed definitions for
task management response/response defs, we run into problems with
existing include/scsi/scsi.h message codes.
> target: Minor sparse warning fixes and annotations
> target: Remove unneeded test of se_cmd
>
> Are not serious bug fixes. I could go either way on some of the error path changes.
>
Yes, these others are minor items that have been submitted by people
(hch, roland, jesper, danc) who have been reviewing target code since it
was merged for .38-rc1.
Considering how minor these are I would prefer to have these merged,
than deferring for-39. If not, then I will need to respin tree w/o
their cleanups if what you prefer to be sent to Linus for-38, there are
3 other bugfix patches in the upstream LIO tree that I have been saving
for-38-rc5 since for-38-rc4 was cut(considering the two outstanding
series). I would like to have these included as well.
Do you want me to send them all to the linux-scsi list again...?
--nab
> James
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-09 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <AANLkTimmb26UiBSukdNnVdxLJpCGd=QqpCw8vQoHALh-@mail.gmail.com>
2011-02-09 17:28 ` Linux 2.6.38-rc4 (target_core: rmmod GP fault) Randy Dunlap
2011-02-09 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-09 20:02 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-02-09 20:13 ` James Bottomley
2011-02-09 20:20 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-02-09 20:28 ` James Bottomley
2011-02-09 20:44 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1297284285.18212.71.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org \
--to=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox