linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Shyam_Iyer@dell.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, rwheeler@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Lsf] Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:26:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1301495212.2618.11.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D9339D3.50500@suse.de>

On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 16:10 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 04:02 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 07:58 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >> No, seriously. I think it would be good to have a separate slot
> >> discussing DCB (be it FCoE or iSCSI) and cgroups.
> >> And how to best align these things.
> >
> > OK, I'll go for that ... Data Centre Bridging; experiences, technologies
> > and needs ... something like that.  What about virtualisation and open
> > vSwitch?
> >
> Hmm. Not qualified enough to talk about the latter; I was more 
> envisioning the storage-related aspects here (multiqueue mapping, 
> QoS classes etc). With virtualisation and open vSwitch we're more in
> the network side of things; doubt open vSwitch can do DCB.
> And even if it could, virtio certainly can't :-)

Technically, the topic DCB is about Data Centre Ethernet enhancements
and converged networks ... that's why it's naturally allied to virtual
switching.

I was thinking we might put up a panel of vendors to get us all an
education on the topic ...

James



  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-30 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1301373398.2590.20.camel@mulgrave.site>
2011-03-29 11:16 ` [Lsf] Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF Ric Wheeler
2011-03-29 11:22   ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-03-29 12:17     ` Jens Axboe
2011-03-29 13:09       ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-03-29 13:12         ` Ric Wheeler
2011-03-29 13:38         ` James Bottomley
2011-03-29 17:20   ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 17:33     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-29 18:10       ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 18:45         ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-29 19:13           ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 19:57             ` Vivek Goyal
2011-03-29 19:59             ` Mike Snitzer
2011-03-29 20:12               ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-29 20:23                 ` Mike Snitzer
2011-03-29 23:09                   ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-30  5:58                     ` [Lsf] " Hannes Reinecke
2011-03-30 14:02                       ` James Bottomley
2011-03-30 14:10                         ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-03-30 14:26                           ` James Bottomley [this message]
2011-03-30 14:55                             ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-03-30 15:33                               ` James Bottomley
2011-03-30 15:46                                 ` Shyam_Iyer
2011-03-30 20:32                                 ` Giridhar Malavali
2011-03-30 20:45                                   ` James Bottomley
2011-03-29 19:47   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-03-29 20:29   ` Jan Kara
2011-03-29 20:31     ` Ric Wheeler
2011-03-30  0:33   ` Mingming Cao
2011-03-30  2:17     ` Dave Chinner
2011-03-30 11:13       ` Theodore Tso
2011-03-30 11:28         ` Ric Wheeler
2011-03-30 14:07           ` Chris Mason
2011-04-01 15:19           ` Ted Ts'o
2011-04-01 16:30             ` Amir Goldstein
2011-04-01 21:46               ` Joel Becker
2011-04-02  3:26                 ` Amir Goldstein
2011-04-01 21:43             ` Joel Becker
2011-03-30 21:49       ` Mingming Cao
2011-03-31  0:05         ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-03-31  1:00         ` Joel Becker
2011-04-01 21:34           ` Mingming Cao
2011-04-01 21:49             ` Joel Becker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1301495212.2618.11.camel@mulgrave.site \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=Shyam_Iyer@dell.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).