From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] lpfc 8.3.24: debugfs additions for SLI4 Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:18:00 -0500 Message-ID: <1306451880.4048.71.camel@mulgrave.site> References: <1306251883.948.2.camel@wookie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:58585 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756405Ab1EZXSH (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 May 2011 19:18:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1306251883.948.2.camel@wookie> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: james.smart@emulex.com Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 11:44 -0400, James Smart wrote: > debugfs additions for new SLI interface You guys need a newer compiler: drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c: In function =E2=80=98lpfc_debugfs_dum= pHBASlim_data.clone.3=E2=80=99: drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:412:1: warning: the frame size of 1036= bytes is larger than 1024 bytes drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c: In function =E2=80=98lpfc_idiag_drbac= c_write=E2=80=99: drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:2260:30: warning: =E2=80=98reg_val=E2=80= =99 may be used uninitialized in this function The reg_val problem looks to be just because the compiler can't work ou= t that one of the if () statements will always be true. The stack overflow is the char buf[1024] James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html