From: Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org>
To: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, eric@purestorage.com
Subject: Handling multiple paths to enclosure devices?
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:05:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311872730-4863-1-git-send-email-roland@kernel.org> (raw)
Hi,
I'm seeing an issue with the current design of our enclosure
handling. In a system with a bunch of drives in an enclosure, it's
definitely helpful to have a way to go from sdXX to which slot in the
enclosure that drive is in, and that's what the symlink
/sys/block/sdXX/device/enclosure_device:NN provides.
However, in a system with multiple paths to the enclosure, eg an HBA
with two external SAS ports, both connected to a SAS expander in a
JBOD, ie in lame ASCII graphics, something like:
+-----+ /-- drv1
| | +-----+ /--- .
| |==SAS==| |-/---- .
| HBA | | exp |------ .
| |==SAS==| |-\---- .
| | +-----+ \--- .
+-----+ \-- drvN
we have two paths to each drive, so each gets two names, sdXX and
sdYY. However, in drivers/misc/enclosure.c, the code only allows one
device in each component and so what happens is that sdXX gets
discovered, then gets an enclosure_device:NN link, then sdYY is
discovered, so sdXX's enclosure_device:NN link is removed and one is
added for sdYY. And so if I want to figure out which enclosure slot
sdXX is in, I'm in for a hard time.
It would be a simple matter of writing code to allow all the block
devices in a slot to link back to that slot -- we would have to be a
bit more careful of keeping track of what links exist, but it should
be doable.
The wrinkle is that there are also /sys/class/enclosure/ZZZ/NN/device
symlinks that allow going the other way. And it's harder to see how
to express multiple block devices in one enclosure slot.
Thoughts on how to improve our enclosure handling?
Thanks!
Roland
next reply other threads:[~2011-07-28 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-28 17:05 Roland Dreier [this message]
2011-07-28 20:33 ` Handling multiple paths to enclosure devices? James Bottomley
2011-07-28 20:57 ` Roland Dreier
2011-07-29 7:09 ` James Bottomley
2011-07-29 7:21 ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-29 7:25 ` James Bottomley
2011-07-28 22:01 ` Douglas Gilbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311872730-4863-1-git-send-email-roland@kernel.org \
--to=roland@kernel.org \
--cc=eric@purestorage.com \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox