public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org>
To: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, eric@purestorage.com
Subject: Re: Handling multiple paths to enclosure devices?
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:57:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311886653-14193-1-git-send-email-roland@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311885202.5464.14.camel@mulgrave>

 > So this configuration should form a single wide port and thus not
 > actually be multiple paths.  However, if you have two HBAs instead of
 > one (or a non-SAS HBA), I grant it becomes multipath.

Yeah ... actually my case is an HBA with two wide (4-lane) ports,
where either the expander or the HBA is not able to fuse them into a
single 8-lane port.  But clearly this can happen at least with two
HBAs pretty easily.

 > My initial thought is that in a multi-path situation, as above, we get
 > two enclosures appearing as well (one down each path).  If we
 > incorporated the idea of topological subtrees into the identity matching
 > code, we'd end up filling each of the enclosures with the path connected
 > devices.  That seems to be an easy situation for multi-path drivers to
 > sort out and one requiring no alteration of the existing enclosure code
 > (except to do the topological subtree search).

Ah, good insight: we do have two copies of the expander device, and so
it would be natural to attach each disk to the expander device on the
same path to that disk.

I'm a bit confused by what you mean about multi-path drivers though --
it would seem we would need the enclosure stuff to handle this
somehow?  It seems that if I have this situation, my HBA driver (eg
mpt2sas) will discover the SCSI bus, hit an enclosure, trigger loading
the ses driver (which pulls in the enclosure driver), and then
continue discovering disks.  And it seems this code needs to get the
topology sorted by itself -- how could a multi-path driver inject
itself into the symlink creation in enclosure.c?

 - R.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-28 20:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-28 17:05 Handling multiple paths to enclosure devices? Roland Dreier
2011-07-28 20:33 ` James Bottomley
2011-07-28 20:57   ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2011-07-29  7:09     ` James Bottomley
2011-07-29  7:21       ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-29  7:25         ` James Bottomley
2011-07-28 22:01   ` Douglas Gilbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1311886653-14193-1-git-send-email-roland@kernel.org \
    --to=roland@kernel.org \
    --cc=eric@purestorage.com \
    --cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox