public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, eric@purestorage.com
Subject: Re: Handling multiple paths to enclosure devices?
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:09:40 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311923380.8190.3.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311886653-14193-1-git-send-email-roland@kernel.org>

On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 13:57 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > My initial thought is that in a multi-path situation, as above, we get
>  > two enclosures appearing as well (one down each path).  If we
>  > incorporated the idea of topological subtrees into the identity matching
>  > code, we'd end up filling each of the enclosures with the path connected
>  > devices.  That seems to be an easy situation for multi-path drivers to
>  > sort out and one requiring no alteration of the existing enclosure code
>  > (except to do the topological subtree search).
> 
> Ah, good insight: we do have two copies of the expander device, and so
> it would be natural to attach each disk to the expander device on the
> same path to that disk.
> 
> I'm a bit confused by what you mean about multi-path drivers though --
> it would seem we would need the enclosure stuff to handle this
> somehow?  It seems that if I have this situation, my HBA driver (eg
> mpt2sas) will discover the SCSI bus, hit an enclosure, trigger loading
> the ses driver (which pulls in the enclosure driver), and then
> continue discovering disks.  And it seems this code needs to get the
> topology sorted by itself -- how could a multi-path driver inject
> itself into the symlink creation in enclosure.c?

I merely meant that our current philosophy is to layer multi-path
awareness in a separate driver: dm.  There's certainly no expander
awareness in dm-mp at the moment, but there could be.  It should be
quite simple:  match the expanders to something like a dm-exp and then
basically use the slot information in the expander to construct dm
devices for each of the physicals (the rule for dm device creation would
be dm-exp slot matching).

James



  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-29  7:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-28 17:05 Handling multiple paths to enclosure devices? Roland Dreier
2011-07-28 20:33 ` James Bottomley
2011-07-28 20:57   ` Roland Dreier
2011-07-29  7:09     ` James Bottomley [this message]
2011-07-29  7:21       ` Hannes Reinecke
2011-07-29  7:25         ` James Bottomley
2011-07-28 22:01   ` Douglas Gilbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1311923380.8190.3.camel@mulgrave \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=eric@purestorage.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roland@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox