From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [SCSI] sd: consolidate sector size alignment check in sd_pref_fn
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 11:29:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1312302550.11352.9.camel@mulgrave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312257053-2522-1-git-send-email-namhyung@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 12:50 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Generalize common code to reduce code duplication.
This code isn't equivalent because it won't fail sector sizes > 4096
which we can't support.
Plus I really don't see much point doing this: ilog2 is a far less
efficient operation on several platforms and this is the hot path.
James
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/sd.c | 32 ++++++++------------------------
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index 953773cb26d9..463a324835f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -735,36 +735,20 @@ static int sd_prep_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
> * and not force the scsi disk driver to use bounce buffers
> * for this.
> */
> - if (sdp->sector_size == 1024) {
> - if ((block & 1) || (blk_rq_sectors(rq) & 1)) {
> - scmd_printk(KERN_ERR, SCpnt,
> - "Bad block number requested\n");
> - goto out;
> - } else {
> - block = block >> 1;
> - this_count = this_count >> 1;
> - }
> - }
> - if (sdp->sector_size == 2048) {
> - if ((block & 3) || (blk_rq_sectors(rq) & 3)) {
> - scmd_printk(KERN_ERR, SCpnt,
> - "Bad block number requested\n");
> - goto out;
> - } else {
> - block = block >> 2;
> - this_count = this_count >> 2;
> - }
> - }
> - if (sdp->sector_size == 4096) {
> - if ((block & 7) || (blk_rq_sectors(rq) & 7)) {
> + if (sdp->sector_size > 512) {
> + int shift = ilog2(sdp->sector_size) - 9;
> +
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(block, 1 << shift) ||
> + !IS_ALIGNED(blk_rq_sectors(rq), 1 << shift)) {
> scmd_printk(KERN_ERR, SCpnt,
> "Bad block number requested\n");
> goto out;
> } else {
> - block = block >> 3;
> - this_count = this_count >> 3;
> + block = block >> shift;
> + this_count = this_count >> shift;
> }
> }
> +
> if (rq_data_dir(rq) == WRITE) {
> if (!sdp->writeable) {
> goto out;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-02 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-02 3:50 [PATCH 1/3] [SCSI] sd: consolidate sector size alignment check in sd_pref_fn Namhyung Kim
2011-08-02 3:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] [SCSI] sd: remove dead code Namhyung Kim
2011-08-02 16:29 ` James Bottomley
2011-08-02 3:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] [SCSI] sd: update kernel doc comments Namhyung Kim
2011-08-02 16:29 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2011-08-03 1:03 ` [PATCH v2] [SCSI] sd: consolidate sector size alignment check in sd_prep_fn Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1312302550.11352.9.camel@mulgrave \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox