From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Roland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] target: Updates for v3.2-rc1 (round one)
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 02:51:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1319536262.18871.14.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzUtu5jVt6XcP+cqLWSK1u+zbuJuWCJU0OhW2XVavv3VA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 11:44 +0200, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. This is not what I get. It might be a git version issue or diff
> > algorithm one - although that's actually pretty unusual. Do you do
> > something odd/special?
>
> Another question: you picked a very particular and odd place to start
> development. It's commit 65112dccf8a ("Merge
> git://git.samba.org/sfrench/cifs-2.6") which just *seems* to be some
> "random Linux tree kernel of the day". I'm not seeing why you picked
> that one.
>
> This is not a deal-breaker, and *please* don't use this as an argument
> for rebasing (quite the opposite), but it's basically a note to ask
> you to just pick a better starting point next time. It's usually much
> better to start from an actual release (preferably a *real* release,
> like 3.0) than from a "random daily tree". Of course, using an -rc1
> release is usually a really bad idea also, but in the rough timeframe
> we're talking about (October 10 - two weeks ago - that's apparently
> when you started worrying about this next merge window) you could have
> at least picked something like -rc9 as the base.
>
> So basically, I'm asking that people not rebase, but also spend a bit
> of time thinking about "where should I start development".
>
Point understood. I'll make sure to pick a tagged -rc release for the
target-pending.git base next time.
Thank you,
--nab
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-25 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-25 9:00 [GIT PULL] target: Updates for v3.2-rc1 (round one) Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-10-25 9:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-25 9:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-25 9:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-25 10:07 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-10-25 9:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-25 9:51 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
2011-10-25 9:45 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2011-10-25 9:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-10-25 9:56 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1319536262.18871.14.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org \
--to=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@purestorage.com \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox