Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Wen Xiong <wenxiong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:34:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1357889656.3065.2.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130111120323.cdc06081d0fb1c498c9f1779@canb.auug.org.au>

On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 12:03 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
> 
> After merging the scsi tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/scsi/ipr.c:9138:22: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'ipr_enable_msix'
> drivers/scsi/ipr.c:9165:22: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'ipr_enable_msi'
> drivers/scsi/ipr.c:9188:23: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'name_msi_vectors'
> drivers/scsi/ipr.c:9200:22: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'ipr_request_other_msi_irqs'
> drivers/scsi/ipr.c: In function 'ipr_probe_ioa':
> drivers/scsi/ipr.c:9422:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'ipr_enable_msix' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> drivers/scsi/ipr.c:9425:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'ipr_enable_msi' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> drivers/scsi/ipr.c:9517:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'name_msi_vectors' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> drivers/scsi/ipr.c:9523:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'ipr_request_other_msi_irqs' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

OK, fine, I'll drop all the ipr patches.  I've been waiting for a month
for them to fix the smatch and sparse warnings.  Please resend the
series with all the fixes.

Thanks,

James

       reply	other threads:[~2013-01-11  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20130111120323.cdc06081d0fb1c498c9f1779@canb.auug.org.au>
2013-01-11  7:34 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2013-01-11 15:27   ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree Brian King
2013-01-11 15:37     ` James Bottomley
2013-01-11 16:05       ` Greg KH
2013-01-11 17:35         ` Brian King
2013-01-11 18:04           ` James Bottomley
2013-01-12  2:23 wenxiong
     [not found] <20150204172925.728016bf@canb.auug.org.au>
2015-02-04 15:26 ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1357889656.3065.2.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=wenxiong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox