From: Ewan Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/9] [SCSI] Enhanced sense and Unit Attention handling
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:53:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359035605.4420.388.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO+b5-oKyPoSdKJPcyaf4FkDUNH25Cwwz=_C4WiwvpfauNqStQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 17:19 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com> wrote:
> > This patch set adds changes to the SCSI mid-layer, sysfs and scsi_debug
> > to provide enhanced support for Unit Attention conditions, as well as
> > detection of reported sense data overflow conditions and some changes
> > to sense data processing. It also adds a uevent when the reported
> > capacity changes on an sd device.
> >
> > There was some discussion about this a couple of years ago on the linux-scsi
> > mailing list: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=129702506514742&w=2
> > Although one approach is to send all SCSI sense data to a userspace daemon
> > for processing, this patch set does not take that approach due to the
> > difficulty in reliably delivering all of the data. An interesting UA
> > condition might not be delivered due to a flood of media errors, for example.
> >
> > The mechanism used is to flag when certain UA ASC/ASCQ codes are received
> > that report asynchronous changes to the storage device configuration.
> > An appropriate uevent is then generated for the scsi_device or scsi_target
> > object. An aggregation mechanism is used to avoid generating uevents at
> > too high a rate, and to coalesce multiple UAs reported by LUNs on the
> > same target for a REPORTED LUNS DATA HAS CHANGED sense code.
>
> Does this patch series add a function that allows SCSI LLDs to report
> AEN data to the SCSI core ? What if a SCSI target reports a LUN
> inventory change via AER to e.g. the iSCSI initiator and that
> initiator ignores the AEN data ? Will that result in AEN data being
> ignored and no automatic LUN rescanning ?
Well, what the patch series does is add handling in scsi_check_sense(),
so any sense processing that went through that path would be handled.
I don't think this would apply to AEN, however. The only AEN handling
that I am aware of was in iscsi-initiator-utils, in userspace, which
did a rescan on the iscsi session when a 3F 0E code was received.
>
> Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-24 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-18 16:27 [PATCH RFC 0/9] [SCSI] Enhanced sense and Unit Attention handling Ewan D. Milne
2013-01-18 16:27 ` [PATCH RFC 1/9] [SCSI] Detect overflow of sense data buffer Ewan D. Milne
2013-01-18 16:46 ` James Bottomley
2013-01-21 7:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-01-21 8:58 ` James Bottomley
2013-01-21 17:42 ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-01-22 15:10 ` Ewan Milne
2013-01-23 7:16 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-01-22 15:08 ` Ewan Milne
2013-01-23 10:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-01-23 13:06 ` James Bottomley
2013-01-23 21:21 ` Ewan Milne
2013-01-18 16:27 ` [PATCH RFC 2/9] [SCSI] Generate uevent on sd capacity change Ewan D. Milne
2013-01-18 16:27 ` [PATCH RFC 3/9] [SCSI] Add a kernel config option for enhanced Unit Attention support Ewan D. Milne
2013-01-18 16:27 ` [PATCH RFC 4/9] [SCSI] Rename scsi_evt_xxx to sdev_evt_xxx and scsi_event to sdev_event Ewan D. Milne
2013-01-22 17:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-01-23 21:08 ` Ewan Milne
2013-01-22 17:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-01-23 20:39 ` Ewan Milne
2013-01-18 16:27 ` [PATCH RFC 5/9] [SCSI] Add support for scsi_target events Ewan D. Milne
2013-01-18 16:27 ` [PATCH RFC 6/9] [SCSI] Generate uevents for certain Unit Attention codes Ewan D. Milne
2013-01-18 16:27 ` [PATCH RFC 7/9] [SCSI] Add sysfs support for enhanced Unit Attention handling Ewan D. Milne
2013-01-18 16:27 ` [PATCH RFC 8/9] [SCSI] Add sense and Unit Attention generation to scsi_debug Ewan D. Milne
2013-01-19 18:43 ` Douglas Gilbert
2013-01-22 15:12 ` Ewan Milne
2013-01-18 16:27 ` [PATCH RFC 9/9] [SCSI] Streamline detection of FM/EOM/ILI status Ewan D. Milne
2013-01-24 0:19 ` [PATCH RFC 0/9] [SCSI] Enhanced sense and Unit Attention handling Bart Van Assche
2013-01-24 11:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-01-24 14:00 ` Ewan Milne
2013-01-24 14:01 ` Mike Christie
2013-01-24 22:02 ` Ewan Milne
2013-01-24 22:47 ` Mike Christie
2013-01-24 14:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-01-24 14:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-01-24 15:00 ` Mike Christie
2013-01-24 15:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-01-24 22:00 ` Ewan Milne
2013-01-26 18:20 ` Mike Christie
2013-01-28 6:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-01-28 15:05 ` Jeremy Linton
2013-01-28 15:44 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-01-28 15:48 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-01-28 20:26 ` James Bottomley
2013-01-28 15:52 ` Jeremy Linton
2013-01-28 16:04 ` Ewan Milne
2013-01-28 16:18 ` Mike Christie
2013-01-29 5:01 ` Shyam_Iyer
2013-01-24 13:53 ` Ewan Milne [this message]
2013-01-31 16:27 ` Ewan Milne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1359035605.4420.388.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=bart.vanassche@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).