From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: Asias He <asias@redhat.com>
Cc: target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target/iblock: Use backend REQ_FLUSH hint for WriteCacheEnabled status
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:39:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359535150.23290.1761.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5108CE20.3040405@redhat.com>
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 15:39 +0800, Asias He wrote:
> On 01/30/2013 02:57 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> >
> > This patch allows IBLOCK to check block hints in request_queue->flush_flags
> > when reporting current backend device WriteCacheEnabled status to a remote
> > SCSI initiator port.
> >
> > This is done via a se_subsystem_api->get_write_cache() call instead of a
> > backend se_device creation time flag, as we expect REQ_FLUSH bits to possibly
> > change from an underlying blk_queue_flush() by the SCSI disk driver, or
> > internal raw struct block_device driver usage.
> >
> > Also go ahead and update iblock_execute_rw() bio I/O path code to use
> > REQ_FLUSH + REQ_FUA hints when determining WRITE_FUA usage, and make SPC
> > emulation code use a spc_check_dev_wce() helper to handle both types of
> > cases for virtual backend subsystem drivers.
> >
> > Reported-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
> > Cc: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> > Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> > Cc: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/target/target_core_device.c | 6 ++++++
> > drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > drivers/target/target_core_spc.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> > include/target/target_core_backend.h | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> > index e269510..1d71930 100644
> > --- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
> > @@ -772,6 +772,12 @@ int se_dev_set_emulate_write_cache(struct se_device *dev, int flag)
> > pr_err("emulate_write_cache not supported for pSCSI\n");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > + if (dev->transport->get_write_cache != NULL) {
>
> one nit:
>
> if (dev->transport->get_write_cache) {
>
> ?
Dropping extra NULL comparison here.
>
> > + pr_warn("emulate_write_cache cannot be changed when underlying"
> > + " HW reports WriteCacheEnabled, ignoring request\n");
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > dev->dev_attrib.emulate_write_cache = flag;
> > pr_debug("dev[%p]: SE Device WRITE_CACHE_EMULATION flag: %d\n",
> > dev, dev->dev_attrib.emulate_write_cache);
> > diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> > index b526d23..fc45683 100644
> > --- a/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> > +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_iblock.c
> > @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ static int iblock_configure_device(struct se_device *dev)
> >
> > if (blk_queue_nonrot(q))
> > dev->dev_attrib.is_nonrot = 1;
> > +
> > return 0;
> >
> > out_free_bioset:
> > @@ -654,20 +655,24 @@ iblock_execute_rw(struct se_cmd *cmd)
> > u32 sg_num = sgl_nents;
> > sector_t block_lba;
> > unsigned bio_cnt;
> > - int rw;
> > + int rw = 0;
> > int i;
> >
> > if (data_direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE) {
> > + struct iblock_dev *ib_dev = IBLOCK_DEV(dev);
> > + struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(ib_dev->ibd_bd);
> > /*
> > - * Force data to disk if we pretend to not have a volatile
> > - * write cache, or the initiator set the Force Unit Access bit.
> > + * Force writethrough using WRITE_FUA if a volatile write cache
> > + * is not enabled, or if initiator set the Force Unit Access bit.
> > */
> > - if (dev->dev_attrib.emulate_write_cache == 0 ||
> > - (dev->dev_attrib.emulate_fua_write > 0 &&
> > - (cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_FUA)))
> > - rw = WRITE_FUA;
> > - else
> > + if (q->flush_flags & REQ_FUA) {
> > + if (cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_FUA)
> > + rw = WRITE_FUA;
> > + else if (!(q->flush_flags & REQ_FLUSH))
> > + rw = WRITE_FUA;
> > + } else {
> > rw = WRITE;
> > + }
> > } else {
> > rw = READ;
> > }
> > @@ -774,6 +779,15 @@ iblock_parse_cdb(struct se_cmd *cmd)
> > return sbc_parse_cdb(cmd, &iblock_sbc_ops);
> > }
> >
> > +bool iblock_get_write_cache(struct se_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct iblock_dev *ib_dev = IBLOCK_DEV(dev);
> > + struct block_device *bd = ib_dev->ibd_bd;
> > + struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bd);
> > +
> > + return (q->flush_flags & REQ_FLUSH);
>
> no need of the ().
>
Dropping unnecessary () for bit-wise comparison.
Thanks Asias!
--nab
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct se_subsystem_api iblock_template = {
> > .name = "iblock",
> > .inquiry_prod = "IBLOCK",
> > @@ -790,6 +804,7 @@ static struct se_subsystem_api iblock_template = {
> > .show_configfs_dev_params = iblock_show_configfs_dev_params,
> > .get_device_type = sbc_get_device_type,
> > .get_blocks = iblock_get_blocks,
> > + .get_write_cache = iblock_get_write_cache,
> > };
> >
> > static int __init iblock_module_init(void)
> > diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c b/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
> > index 1346f8a..db6d003 100644
> > --- a/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
> > @@ -407,16 +407,31 @@ check_scsi_name:
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(spc_emulate_evpd_83);
> >
> > +static bool
> > +spc_check_dev_wce(struct se_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + bool wce = false;
> > +
> > + if (dev->transport->get_write_cache)
> > + wce = dev->transport->get_write_cache(dev);
> > + else if (dev->dev_attrib.emulate_write_cache > 0)
> > + wce = true;
> > +
> > + return wce;
> > +}
> > +
> > /* Extended INQUIRY Data VPD Page */
> > static sense_reason_t
> > spc_emulate_evpd_86(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char *buf)
> > {
> > + struct se_device *dev = cmd->se_dev;
> > +
> > buf[3] = 0x3c;
> > /* Set HEADSUP, ORDSUP, SIMPSUP */
> > buf[5] = 0x07;
> >
> > /* If WriteCache emulation is enabled, set V_SUP */
> > - if (cmd->se_dev->dev_attrib.emulate_write_cache > 0)
> > + if (spc_check_dev_wce(dev))
> > buf[6] = 0x01;
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -767,7 +782,7 @@ static int spc_modesense_caching(struct se_device *dev, u8 pc, u8 *p)
> > if (pc == 1)
> > goto out;
> >
> > - if (dev->dev_attrib.emulate_write_cache > 0)
> > + if (spc_check_dev_wce(dev))
> > p[2] = 0x04; /* Write Cache Enable */
> > p[12] = 0x20; /* Disabled Read Ahead */
> >
> > @@ -897,7 +912,7 @@ static sense_reason_t spc_emulate_modesense(struct se_cmd *cmd)
> > (cmd->se_deve->lun_flags & TRANSPORT_LUNFLAGS_READ_ONLY)))
> > spc_modesense_write_protect(&buf[length], type);
> >
> > - if ((dev->dev_attrib.emulate_write_cache > 0) &&
> > + if ((spc_check_dev_wce(dev)) &&
> > (dev->dev_attrib.emulate_fua_write > 0))
> > spc_modesense_dpofua(&buf[length], type);
> >
> > diff --git a/include/target/target_core_backend.h b/include/target/target_core_backend.h
> > index 819b0fc..f9a8016 100644
> > --- a/include/target/target_core_backend.h
> > +++ b/include/target/target_core_backend.h
> > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct se_subsystem_api {
> > u32 (*get_device_type)(struct se_device *);
> > sector_t (*get_blocks)(struct se_device *);
> > unsigned char *(*get_sense_buffer)(struct se_cmd *);
> > + bool (*get_write_cache)(struct se_device *);
> > };
> >
> > struct sbc_ops {
> >
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-30 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-30 6:57 [PATCH] target/iblock: Use backend REQ_FLUSH hint for WriteCacheEnabled status Nicholas A. Bellinger
2013-01-30 7:39 ` Asias He
2013-01-30 8:39 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1359535150.23290.1761.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org \
--to=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=JBottomley@Parallels.com \
--cc=asias@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=majianpeng@gmail.com \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox