RE: [PATCH V1 0/8] ufs patch siries

Dolev Raviv
2013-05-14T08:01:45Z

Yes, apparently I have, and I missed this mail as well until it was
brought to my attention earlier.

I apologise for re sending the patch series with mistakes, I withdraw it
and let Santosh send it as he see fit.

> On Monday, May 13, 2013, Dolev Raviv wrote:
>> This patch series clusters the latest version of all the UFS patches in
>> the
>> SCSI mailing list. It gives a stable functional base line for the UFS
>> driver.
>>
>> It includes the following versions:
>> > [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: devicetree: Add DT bindings for UFS host
>> > controller
>> > [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: Fix the response UPIU length setting
>> > [PATCH v4 1/6] scsi: ufs: wrap the i/o access operations
>> > [PATCH v4 2/6] scsi: ufs: amend interrupt configuration
>> > [PATCH v4 3/6] scsi: ufs: fix interrupt status clears
>> > [PATCH v4 4/6] scsi: ufs: rework link start-up process
>> > [PATCH V5 1/1] scsi: ufs: Add support for sending NOP OUT UPIU
>> > [PATCH V4] scsi: ufs: Set fDeviceInit flag to initiate device
>> > initialization
>>
>> But does not include:
>> > [PATCH v4 5/6] scsi: ufs: add dme configuration primit
>> > [PATCH v4 6/6] scsi: ufs: add dme control primitives
>>
>>
>> Dolev Raviv (8):
>> Documentation: devicetree: Add DT bindings for UFS host controller
>> scsi: ufs: Fix the response UPIU length setting
>> scsi: ufs: wrap the i/o access operations
>> scsi: ufs: amend interrupt configuration
>> scsi: ufs: fix interrupt status clears
>> scsi: ufs: rework link start-up process
>> scsi: ufs: Add support for sending NOP OUT UPIU
>> scsi: ufs: Set fDeviceInit flag to initiate device initialization
>
> It seems that you missed my first comment on previous mailing.
>
> RE: [PATCH V1 3/8] scsi: ufs: wrap the i/o access operations
> Could you check the e-mail?
>
> If you intended to sort the patches instead of Santosh,
> you should have identify the author per patch e-mail expect 8/8 which is
> from you.
> 'From: Author name <Author e-mail>' is expected in the head of e-mail.
> I feel that maintainer has this role, though.
>
> And there is need to check the base of tree for ufshcd.
> ' scsi: ufs: add support for query requests' is not merged finally.
> I think we can talk with Santosh for those.
>
> Thanks,
> Seungwon Jeon
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>