From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Neukum Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hard disk S3 resume time optimization Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 19:05:05 +0200 Message-ID: <1375463105.13494.0.camel@linux-fkkt.site> References: <11E08D716F0541429B7042699DD5C1A1706803A6@FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> ,<1375447356.2138.13.camel@linux-fkkt.site> <11E08D716F0541429B7042699DD5C1A1706804B6@FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <11E08D716F0541429B7042699DD5C1A1706804B6@FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Brandt, Todd E" Cc: "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 16:41 +0000, Brandt, Todd E wrote: > Do you mean in terms of debug after a failure? I can resubmit the patch with the scsi_sense_hdr buffer still in place. I just wanted to keep the first draft simple to get the concept across. How are errors reported? Regards Oliver