* [PATCH 16/18] lpfc 8.3.42: Fixed inconsistent spin lock usage.
@ 2013-09-06 16:22 James Smart
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: James Smart @ 2013-09-06 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
Fixed inconsistent spin lock usage.
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
---
lpfc_init.c | 8 ++++----
lpfc_scsi.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c 2013-09-06 10:04:24.916058781 -0400
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c 2013-09-06 10:04:32.475058953 -0400
@@ -3031,10 +3031,10 @@ lpfc_sli4_xri_sgl_update(struct lpfc_hba
phba->sli4_hba.scsi_xri_max);
spin_lock_irq(&phba->scsi_buf_list_get_lock);
- spin_lock_irq(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock);
+ spin_lock(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock);
list_splice_init(&phba->lpfc_scsi_buf_list_get, &scsi_sgl_list);
list_splice(&phba->lpfc_scsi_buf_list_put, &scsi_sgl_list);
- spin_unlock_irq(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock);
spin_unlock_irq(&phba->scsi_buf_list_get_lock);
if (phba->sli4_hba.scsi_xri_cnt > phba->sli4_hba.scsi_xri_max) {
@@ -3070,10 +3070,10 @@ lpfc_sli4_xri_sgl_update(struct lpfc_hba
psb->cur_iocbq.sli4_xritag = phba->sli4_hba.xri_ids[lxri];
}
spin_lock_irq(&phba->scsi_buf_list_get_lock);
- spin_lock_irq(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock);
+ spin_lock(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock);
list_splice_init(&scsi_sgl_list, &phba->lpfc_scsi_buf_list_get);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&phba->lpfc_scsi_buf_list_put);
- spin_unlock_irq(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock);
spin_unlock_irq(&phba->scsi_buf_list_get_lock);
return 0;
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c 2013-09-06 10:04:28.751058869 -0400
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c 2013-09-06 10:04:32.486058953 -0400
@@ -926,10 +926,10 @@ lpfc_sli4_repost_scsi_sgl_list(struct lp
/* get all SCSI buffers need to repost to a local list */
spin_lock_irq(&phba->scsi_buf_list_get_lock);
- spin_lock_irq(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock);
+ spin_lock(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock);
list_splice_init(&phba->lpfc_scsi_buf_list_get, &post_sblist);
list_splice(&phba->lpfc_scsi_buf_list_put, &post_sblist);
- spin_unlock_irq(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock);
spin_unlock_irq(&phba->scsi_buf_list_get_lock);
/* post the list of scsi buffer sgls to port if available */
@@ -1137,22 +1137,21 @@ lpfc_get_scsi_buf_s3(struct lpfc_hba *ph
{
struct lpfc_scsi_buf * lpfc_cmd = NULL;
struct list_head *scsi_buf_list_get = &phba->lpfc_scsi_buf_list_get;
- unsigned long gflag = 0;
- unsigned long pflag = 0;
+ unsigned long iflag = 0;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->scsi_buf_list_get_lock, gflag);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->scsi_buf_list_get_lock, iflag);
list_remove_head(scsi_buf_list_get, lpfc_cmd, struct lpfc_scsi_buf,
list);
if (!lpfc_cmd) {
- spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock, pflag);
+ spin_lock(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock);
list_splice(&phba->lpfc_scsi_buf_list_put,
&phba->lpfc_scsi_buf_list_get);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&phba->lpfc_scsi_buf_list_put);
list_remove_head(scsi_buf_list_get, lpfc_cmd,
struct lpfc_scsi_buf, list);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock, pflag);
+ spin_unlock(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock);
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->scsi_buf_list_get_lock, gflag);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->scsi_buf_list_get_lock, iflag);
return lpfc_cmd;
}
/**
@@ -1170,11 +1169,10 @@ static struct lpfc_scsi_buf*
lpfc_get_scsi_buf_s4(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_nodelist *ndlp)
{
struct lpfc_scsi_buf *lpfc_cmd, *lpfc_cmd_next;
- unsigned long gflag = 0;
- unsigned long pflag = 0;
+ unsigned long iflag = 0;
int found = 0;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->scsi_buf_list_get_lock, gflag);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->scsi_buf_list_get_lock, iflag);
list_for_each_entry_safe(lpfc_cmd, lpfc_cmd_next,
&phba->lpfc_scsi_buf_list_get, list) {
if (lpfc_test_rrq_active(phba, ndlp,
@@ -1185,11 +1183,11 @@ lpfc_get_scsi_buf_s4(struct lpfc_hba *ph
break;
}
if (!found) {
- spin_lock_irqsave(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock, pflag);
+ spin_lock(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock);
list_splice(&phba->lpfc_scsi_buf_list_put,
&phba->lpfc_scsi_buf_list_get);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&phba->lpfc_scsi_buf_list_put);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock, pflag);
+ spin_unlock(&phba->scsi_buf_list_put_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(lpfc_cmd, lpfc_cmd_next,
&phba->lpfc_scsi_buf_list_get, list) {
if (lpfc_test_rrq_active(
@@ -1200,7 +1198,7 @@ lpfc_get_scsi_buf_s4(struct lpfc_hba *ph
break;
}
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->scsi_buf_list_get_lock, gflag);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->scsi_buf_list_get_lock, iflag);
if (!found)
return NULL;
return lpfc_cmd;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-09-06 16:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-09-06 16:22 [PATCH 16/18] lpfc 8.3.42: Fixed inconsistent spin lock usage James Smart
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).