From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
linux-scsi list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: delete decade+ obsolete aic7xxx_old driver
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:10:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1379448607.2213.16.camel@dabdike> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52386730.4060508@suse.de>
On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 16:29 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 09/17/2013 04:13 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > Yes, this driver is well past ready to be removed.
> >
> > Acked-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
> >
> > Sent from my ASUS Pad
> >
> > Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
> >
> >> After getting warnings in an allyesconfig build[1] from this
> >> driver, I decided to remind myself just how old it was, and
> >> whether it warranted fixing. In the Kconfig help text, I found:
> >>
> >> "This driver will eventually be phased out entirely"
> >>
> >> Going back to the history archive, I see the line was added[2]
> >> in Feb 2002, when we moved from v2.4.2.1 ---> v2.4.2.2
> >>
> >> So, with over a decade of notification, and multiple major releases
> >> since then, I think we can justify removing this. Currently we have
> >> people wasting time building it during routine testing, and then
> >> wasting more time re-researching the known reported warnings, only to
> >> find that nobody really is willing to integrate the fixes[3] for it.
> >>
> >> A quick search didn't seem to indicate any active user base for it.
> >> If someone happens to have a quirky _old_ card that the eleven year
> >> old "new" driver doesn't work with, then it is entirely reasonable
> >> that they stick with a kernel version that predates this removal.
> >>
> >> [1] drivers/scsi/aic7xxx_old.c: In function ‘aic7xxx_register’:
> >> drivers/scsi/aic7xxx_old.c:7901:5: warning: case value ‘257’ not in enumerated type ‘ahc_chip’ [-Wswitch]
> >> drivers/scsi/aic7xxx_old.c:7898:5: warning: case value ‘513’ not in enumerated type ‘ahc_chip’ [-Wswitch]
> >> drivers/scsi/aic7xxx_old.c: In function ‘aic7xxx_load_seeprom’:
> >> drivers/scsi/aic7xxx_old.c:8517:5: warning: case value ‘257’ not in enumerated type ‘ahc_chip’ [-Wswitch]
> >> drivers/scsi/aic7xxx_old.c:8510:5: warning: case value ‘513’ not in enumerated type ‘ahc_chip’ [-Wswitch]
> >>
> >> [2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git commit 44e8778c
> >>
> >> [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/29/215
> >>
> >> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> >> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
> >> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@parallels.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>
> However, if we do this we're removing support for any non-PCI based
> adapters. I personally doubt that there are any installations left
> running on (E)ISA or VLB. But we should be clear on this.
Actually, that's not true: the aic7xxx driver has support for EISA (I
know because I've got one) but not the VLB and some of the really old
cards.
> In general I'm in favour removing obsolete drivers, so
OK, so do we have any real evidence that no-one uses this driver? Does
any distro actually compile it, for instance?
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-17 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-17 2:13 [PATCH] scsi: delete decade+ obsolete aic7xxx_old driver Doug Ledford
2013-09-17 14:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-09-17 14:42 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-09-17 20:10 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2013-09-17 20:10 ` James Bottomley
2013-09-17 20:27 ` Doug Ledford
2013-09-18 0:11 ` Paul Gortmaker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-17 1:51 Paul Gortmaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1379448607.2213.16.camel@dabdike \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).