From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pm80xx : Fixed return value issue Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:47:00 -0800 Message-ID: <1386791220.2109.0.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> References: <1386651698-4331-1-git-send-email-Viswas.G@pmcs.com> <52A89480.1010104@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:44682 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750865Ab3LKTrJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:47:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <52A89480.1010104@redhat.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Tomas Henzl Cc: Viswas G , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, xjtuwjp@gmail.com, Vasanthalakshmi.Tharmarajan@pmcs.com, Suresh.Thiagarajan@pmcs.com On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 17:36 +0100, Tomas Henzl wrote: > On 12/10/2013 06:01 AM, Viswas G wrote: > > pm80xx_get_gsm_dump() was returning "1" in error case > > instead of negative error value. > > > > Signed-off-by: Viswas G > > Reviewed-by: Jack Wang > > Acked-by: TomasHenzl > > Hi Viswas, > > I've ack-ed a different patch before, so I don't think you should add that acked-by line. > The V2 patch is fine for me too, so again - > Acked-by: Tomas Henzl Actually, it can't be acked-by; that's for maintainers agreeing to patches not via them ... I assume it should be reviewed by? James