From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] IB/isert: seperate connection protection domains and dma MRs Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 11:44:27 -0800 Message-ID: <1389642267.5567.448.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> References: <1389285658-7037-1-git-send-email-sagig@mellanox.com> <1389285658-7037-3-git-send-email-sagig@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.linux-iscsi.org ([67.23.28.174]:35143 "EHLO linux-iscsi.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752527AbaAMTmg (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 14:42:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1389285658-7037-3-git-send-email-sagig@mellanox.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Sagi Grimberg Cc: target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, ogerlitz@mellanox.com, oren@mellanox.com Hi Sagi, On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 18:40 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > It is more correct to seperate connections protection domains > and dma_mr handles. protection information support requires to > do so. > > Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg > --- > drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++--------------- > drivers/infiniband/ulp/isert/ib_isert.h | 2 - > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > Applied to for-next, given this patch does not depend on the proposed VERBS protection changes. --nab