From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/35] hpsa: add hp_ssd_smart_path_enabled sysfs attribute Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:28:14 +0400 Message-ID: <1394710094.2192.20.camel@dabdike> References: <20140218195251.15787.55872.stgit@beardog.cce.hp.com> <20140218195554.15787.37119.stgit@beardog.cce.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:43099 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753261AbaCMOSC (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:18:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140218195554.15787.37119.stgit@beardog.cce.hp.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Stephen M. Cameron" Cc: dab@hp.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, stephenmcameron@gmail.com, joseph.t.handzik@hp.com, thenzl@redhat.com, michael.miller@canonical.com, scott.teel@hp.com On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 13:55 -0600, Stephen M. Cameron wrote: > From: Scott Teel > > Signed-off-by: Scott Teel > Acked-by: Stephen M. Cameron Just a note: when you send a patch to me, that should be signed-off-by. It's because you're part of the transmission path under the DCO (which the signoffs track). When you want me to apply a patch someone else sends in, you either resend it to me with your signoff or just ack it (acked by means you approve it but didn't resend it to me). I've altered all the acks from you in this series to signoffs. James