From: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/11] lpfc 10.2.8000.0: Fix locking for lpfc_hba_down_post
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 13:51:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1396633894.1924.15.camel@myfc17> (raw)
Fix locking for lpfc_hba_down_post
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
---
lpfc_init.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c 2014-03-31 16:21:37.000000000 -0400
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c 2014-04-03 10:24:20.116308496 -0400
@@ -820,29 +820,28 @@ lpfc_hba_down_prep(struct lpfc_hba *phba
}
/**
- * lpfc_hba_down_post_s3 - Perform lpfc uninitialization after HBA reset
+ * lpfc_hba_free_post_buf - Perform lpfc uninitialization after HBA reset
* @phba: pointer to lpfc HBA data structure.
*
- * This routine will do uninitialization after the HBA is reset when bring
- * down the SLI Layer.
+ * This routine will cleanup posted ELS buffers after the HBA is reset
+ * when bringing down the SLI Layer.
+ *
*
* Return codes
- * 0 - success.
- * Any other value - error.
+ * void.
**/
-static int
-lpfc_hba_down_post_s3(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
+static void
+lpfc_hba_free_post_buf(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
{
struct lpfc_sli *psli = &phba->sli;
struct lpfc_sli_ring *pring;
struct lpfc_dmabuf *mp, *next_mp;
- LIST_HEAD(completions);
- int i;
if (phba->sli3_options & LPFC_SLI3_HBQ_ENABLED)
lpfc_sli_hbqbuf_free_all(phba);
else {
/* Cleanup preposted buffers on the ELS ring */
+ spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
pring = &psli->ring[LPFC_ELS_RING];
list_for_each_entry_safe(mp, next_mp, &pring->postbufq, list) {
list_del(&mp->list);
@@ -850,27 +849,70 @@ lpfc_hba_down_post_s3(struct lpfc_hba *p
lpfc_mbuf_free(phba, mp->virt, mp->phys);
kfree(mp);
}
+ spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
}
+}
+
+/**
+ * lpfc_hba_clean_txcmplq - Perform lpfc uninitialization after HBA reset
+ * @phba: pointer to lpfc HBA data structure.
+ *
+ * This routine will cleanup the txcmplq after the HBA is reset when bringing
+ * down the SLI Layer.
+ *
+ * Return codes
+ * void
+ **/
+static void
+lpfc_hba_clean_txcmplq(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
+{
+ struct lpfc_sli *psli = &phba->sli;
+ struct lpfc_sli_ring *pring;
+ LIST_HEAD(completions);
+ int i;
+
+
- spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
for (i = 0; i < psli->num_rings; i++) {
pring = &psli->ring[i];
-
+ if (phba->sli_rev >= LPFC_SLI_REV4)
+ spin_lock_irq(&pring->ring_lock);
+ else
+ spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
/* At this point in time the HBA is either reset or DOA. Either
* way, nothing should be on txcmplq as it will NEVER complete.
*/
list_splice_init(&pring->txcmplq, &completions);
- spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
+
+ if (phba->sli_rev >= LPFC_SLI_REV4)
+ spin_unlock_irq(&pring->ring_lock);
+ else
+ spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
/* Cancel all the IOCBs from the completions list */
lpfc_sli_cancel_iocbs(phba, &completions, IOSTAT_LOCAL_REJECT,
IOERR_SLI_ABORTED);
-
lpfc_sli_abort_iocb_ring(phba, pring);
- spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
+}
+/**
+ * lpfc_hba_down_post_s3 - Perform lpfc uninitialization after HBA reset
+ int i;
+ * @phba: pointer to lpfc HBA data structure.
+ *
+ * This routine will do uninitialization after the HBA is reset when bring
+ * down the SLI Layer.
+ *
+ * Return codes
+ * 0 - success.
+ * Any other value - error.
+ **/
+static int
+lpfc_hba_down_post_s3(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
+{
+ lpfc_hba_free_post_buf(phba);
+ lpfc_hba_clean_txcmplq(phba);
return 0;
}
@@ -890,13 +932,12 @@ lpfc_hba_down_post_s4(struct lpfc_hba *p
{
struct lpfc_scsi_buf *psb, *psb_next;
LIST_HEAD(aborts);
- int ret;
unsigned long iflag = 0;
struct lpfc_sglq *sglq_entry = NULL;
- ret = lpfc_hba_down_post_s3(phba);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ lpfc_hba_free_post_buf(phba);
+ lpfc_hba_clean_txcmplq(phba);
+
/* At this point in time the HBA is either reset or DOA. Either
* way, nothing should be on lpfc_abts_els_sgl_list, it needs to be
* on the lpfc_sgl_list so that it can either be freed if the
reply other threads:[~2014-04-04 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1396633894.1924.15.camel@myfc17 \
--to=james.smart@emulex.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox