From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree updated Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 10:47:08 -0700 Message-ID: <1408038428.2066.42.camel@jarvis.lan> References: <20140708134003.GA7790@infradead.org> <20140801122042.GA10771@infradead.org> <1406925121.2654.21.camel@jarvis> <20140804111147.GA29148@infradead.org> <1407162004.4243.1.camel@jarvis.lan> <20140814125451.GA832@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140814125451.GA832@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 05:54 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 07:20:04AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > > The drivers side are a bunch of smaller fixes for iscsi and pm8001 which > > > never have been a problem to put in near the end of the merge window, > > > especially if they have a few more days linux-next exposure in > > > Linux-next even after the 3.16 release. They absolutely would be > > > candidates for a second pull even if they'd miss the first pull. > > > > OK, since I have to do a second pull anyway we might as well follow the > > rules. > > Ok, new tree is out, the core-for-3.17 has the one 64-bit lun format > string fix that didn't make it into the first pull request, the > queuecommand device busy regression fix, and the cmd_pool fix. > > The drivers-for-3.17 just has the driver updates I pushed earlier that > didn't make the cut. So this is a bit late to get through linux-next and into a pull request. I was planning on sending the final pull tomorrow (in case Linus planned a surprise early release). Can we redo some of these as bug fixes and send them in for -rc1? James