From: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] lpfc: correct device removal deadlock after link bounce
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:08:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1419959338.1683.1.camel@myfc17> (raw)
This patch, applicable to 8G/4G/2G adapters, adds a call that
resumes transmit operations after a link bounce. Without it, targets
that tried to suspend exchanges after a link bounce (such as tape devices
using sequence level error recovery) would never resume io operation,
causing scan failures, and eventually deadlocks if a device removal
request is made.
The patches were cut against Christoph's scsi-queue.git,
branch "drivers-for-3.18". The driver rev cut against is 10.4.8000.0
-- james s
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@emulex.com>
---
lpfc_els.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff -upNr a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c 2014-12-29 12:48:08.000000000 -0500
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c 2014-12-30 11:23:04.344426606 -0500
@@ -2225,6 +2225,15 @@ lpfc_adisc_done(struct lpfc_vport *vport
if ((phba->sli3_options & LPFC_SLI3_NPIV_ENABLED) &&
!(vport->fc_flag & FC_RSCN_MODE) &&
(phba->sli_rev < LPFC_SLI_REV4)) {
+ /* The ADISCs are complete. Doesn't matter if they
+ * succeeded or failed because the ADISC completion
+ * routine guarantees to call the state machine and
+ * the RPI is either unregistered (failed ADISC response)
+ * or the RPI is still valid and the node is marked
+ * mapped for a target. The exchanges should be in the
+ * correct state. This code is specific to SLI3.
+ */
+ lpfc_issue_clear_la(phba, vport);
lpfc_issue_reg_vpi(phba, vport);
return;
}
next reply other threads:[~2014-12-30 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-30 17:08 James Smart [this message]
2014-12-30 17:15 ` [PATCH] lpfc: correct device removal deadlock after link bounce Laurence Oberman
2015-01-02 16:22 ` Ewan Milne
2015-01-05 19:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1419959338.1683.1.camel@myfc17 \
--to=james.smart@emulex.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).