From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 37/42] hpsa: use block layer tag for command allocation Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 08:13:43 -0700 Message-ID: <1428678823.2178.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <20150317200139.19856.87982.stgit@brunhilda> <20150317200651.19856.77450.stgit@brunhilda> <55104616.2070303@redhat.com> <07F70BBF6832E34FA1C923241E8833AB486892F9@BBYEXM01.pmc-sierra.internal> <5512FF8E.9010702@hp.com> <5513FFDD.6090809@redhat.com> <551419DE.5040801@hp.com> <55142178.0@redhat.com> <55142331.8060304@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:32801 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932925AbbDJPNp (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:13:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <55142331.8060304@hp.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Webb Scales Cc: Tomas Henzl , "Brace, Don" , "Teel, Scott Stacy" , kevin.barnett@pmcs.com, james.bottomley@parallels.com, Christoph Hellwig , "Lindley, Justin" , SCSI development list On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 11:18 -0400, Webb Scales wrote: > At this point, I've turned this work over to Don; I presume he'll want > to address the bitmask search. I'll leave it up to him to decide what to > do about the refcount. Is there an update on this? Firstly the delay is going to cause you to miss the merge window (assuming it opens on Sunday) and secondly reviewers can get demotivated if you apparently don't address their concerns. James