From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] scsi: use host wide tags by default
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:42:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1429306960.1079.25.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429301471-5666-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 22:11 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/53c700.c b/drivers/scsi/53c700.c
> index 82abfce..941a424 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/53c700.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/53c700.c
> @@ -325,7 +325,6 @@ NCR_700_detect(struct scsi_host_template *tpnt,
> tpnt->slave_destroy = NCR_700_slave_destroy;
> tpnt->slave_alloc = NCR_700_slave_alloc;
> tpnt->change_queue_depth = NCR_700_change_queue_depth;
> - tpnt->use_blk_tags = 1;
>
> if(tpnt->name == NULL)
> tpnt->name = "53c700";
> @@ -1107,7 +1106,9 @@ process_script_interrupt(__u32 dsps, __u32 dsp, struct scsi_cmnd *SCp,
> BUG();
> }
> if(hostdata->msgin[1] == A_SIMPLE_TAG_MSG) {
> - struct scsi_cmnd *SCp = scsi_find_tag(SDp, hostdata->msgin[2]);
> + struct scsi_cmnd *SCp;
> +
> + SCp = scsi_find_tag(SDp->host, hostdata->msgin[2]);
This (and the following) is a stylistic modification and doesn't really
belong here.
> if(unlikely(SCp == NULL)) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "scsi%d: (%d:%d) no saved request for tag %d\n",
> host->host_no, reselection_id, lun, hostdata->msgin[2]);
> @@ -1119,7 +1120,9 @@ process_script_interrupt(__u32 dsps, __u32 dsp, struct scsi_cmnd *SCp,
> "reselection is tag %d, slot %p(%d)\n",
> hostdata->msgin[2], slot, slot->tag);
> } else {
> - struct scsi_cmnd *SCp = scsi_find_tag(SDp, SCSI_NO_TAG);
> + struct scsi_cmnd *SCp;
> +
> + SCp = scsi_find_tag(SDp->host, SCSI_NO_TAG);
> if(unlikely(SCp == NULL)) {
> sdev_printk(KERN_ERR, SDp,
> "no saved request for untagged cmd\n");
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> index 3833bf5..72a72f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> @@ -662,32 +662,14 @@ void scsi_finish_command(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> */
> int scsi_change_queue_depth(struct scsi_device *sdev, int depth)
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> - if (depth <= 0)
> - goto out;
> -
> - spin_lock_irqsave(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock, flags);
> + if (depth > 0) {
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> - /*
> - * Check to see if the queue is managed by the block layer.
> - * If it is, and we fail to adjust the depth, exit.
> - *
> - * Do not resize the tag map if it is a host wide share bqt,
> - * because the size should be the hosts's can_queue. If there
> - * is more IO than the LLD's can_queue (so there are not enuogh
> - * tags) request_fn's host queue ready check will handle it.
> - */
> - if (!shost_use_blk_mq(sdev->host) && !sdev->host->bqt) {
> - if (blk_queue_tagged(sdev->request_queue) &&
> - blk_queue_resize_tags(sdev->request_queue, depth) != 0)
> - goto out_unlock;
> + spin_lock_irqsave(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock, flags);
> + sdev->queue_depth = depth;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock, flags);
This lock/unlock is a nasty global sync point which can be eliminated:
we can rely on the architectural atomicity of 32 bit writes (might need
to make sdev->queue_depth a u32 because I seem to remember 16 bit writes
had to be done as two byte stores on some architectures).
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-17 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-17 20:11 [PATCH, RFC] scsi: use host wide tags by default Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-17 21:42 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2015-04-17 21:44 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-17 21:46 ` James Bottomley
2015-04-17 21:47 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-17 21:57 ` James Bottomley
2015-04-17 22:07 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-17 22:20 ` James Bottomley
2015-04-17 22:40 ` Jens Axboe
2015-04-20 18:07 ` James Bottomley
2015-04-18 4:05 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2015-04-18 9:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-17 21:43 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1429306960.1079.25.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox