From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com>
Cc: JBottomley@odin.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/arm/acornscsi.c: rename CONFIG_ACORNSCSI_CONSTANTS
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 21:34:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1430249682.2411.79.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD3Xx4LMZudtWBajjpNgLjXbCKmiAq9YyMZwMNn=5=5w_1vCPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Valentin,
On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 21:26 +0200, Valentin Rothberg wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> wrote:
> > Will the Erlangen bot still spot ACORNSCSI_CONSTANTS as a potential
> > issue?
>
> No, undertaker-checkpatch won't complain about this. There are
> thousands of such cases (i.e., without CONFIG_ prefix) around in the
> code (mostly #ifdef DEBUG). But most of them are intentionally dead
> or related to debugging, so they are ignored to avoid having false
> positives.
Well, in a few years time, once undertaker-checkpatch has stomped out
most of the faux Kconfig preprocessor checks, that might be an area to
cover too. Or is that issue, ie pointless preprocessor checks, harder
than one might naively think?
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-28 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-28 14:15 [PATCH] drivers/scsi/arm/acornscsi.c: rename CONFIG_ACORNSCSI_CONSTANTS Valentin Rothberg
2015-04-28 19:10 ` Paul Bolle
2015-04-28 19:26 ` Valentin Rothberg
2015-04-28 19:34 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2015-04-28 19:57 ` Valentin Rothberg
2015-05-06 10:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1430249682.2411.79.camel@x220 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=JBottomley@odin.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=valentinrothberg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox