From: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 27/34] atp870u: Add remaining 870 support to is885()
Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 19:31:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1430674310-11576-28-git-send-email-linux@rainbow-software.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430674310-11576-1-git-send-email-linux@rainbow-software.org>
Add remaining 870 support to is885():
- different synw, no synuw
- synu[4] = 0x0c
- atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x04, 0x00); instead of
atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x14, 0x00); (isn't that a bug?)
- atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x14, 0xff); instead of
atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x14, 0x06);
- different mbuf[3] and mbuf[4] checks
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
---
drivers/scsi/atp870u.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/atp870u.c b/drivers/scsi/atp870u.c
index 5c98ffc..2023fb8 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/atp870u.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/atp870u.c
@@ -2263,6 +2263,7 @@ static void is885(struct atp_unit *dev, unsigned char c, bool wide_chip, unsigne
static unsigned char synn[6] = { 0x80, 1, 3, 1, 0x19, 0x0e };
unsigned char synu[6] = { 0x80, 1, 3, 1, 0x0a, 0x0e };
static unsigned char synw[6] = { 0x80, 1, 3, 1, 0x19, 0x0e };
+ static unsigned char synw_870[6] = { 0x80, 1, 3, 1, 0x0c, 0x07 };
unsigned char synuw[6] = { 0x80, 1, 3, 1, 0x0a, 0x0e };
static unsigned char wide[6] = { 0x80, 1, 2, 3, 1, 0 };
static unsigned char u3[9] = { 0x80, 1, 6, 4, 0x09, 00, 0x0e, 0x01, 0x02 };
@@ -2312,7 +2313,10 @@ static void is885(struct atp_unit *dev, unsigned char c, bool wide_chip, unsigne
dev->active_id[c] |= m;
atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x10, 0x30);
- atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x14, 0x00);
+ if (dev->dev_id == ATP885_DEVID || dev->dev_id == ATP880_DEVID1 || dev->dev_id == ATP880_DEVID2)
+ atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x14, 0x00);
+ else /* result of is870() merge - is this a bug? */
+ atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x04, 0x00);
phase_cmd:
atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x18, 0x08);
@@ -2658,7 +2662,7 @@ not_wide:
}
continue;
set_sync:
- if (dev->sp[c][i] == 0x02) {
+ if ((dev->dev_id != ATP885_DEVID && dev->dev_id != ATP880_DEVID1 && dev->dev_id != ATP880_DEVID2) || (dev->sp[c][i] == 0x02)) {
synu[4] = 0x0c;
synuw[4] = 0x0c;
} else {
@@ -2702,11 +2706,14 @@ try_sync:
while ((atp_readb_io(dev, c, 0x1f) & 0x80) == 0) {
if ((atp_readb_io(dev, c, 0x1f) & 0x01) != 0) {
if ((m & dev->wide_id[c]) != 0) {
- if ((m & dev->ultra_map[c]) != 0) {
- atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x19, synuw[j++]);
- } else {
- atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x19, synw[j++]);
- }
+ if (dev->dev_id == ATP885_DEVID || dev->dev_id == ATP880_DEVID1 || dev->dev_id == ATP880_DEVID2) {
+ if ((m & dev->ultra_map[c]) != 0) {
+ atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x19, synuw[j++]);
+ } else {
+ atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x19, synw[j++]);
+ }
+ } else
+ atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x19, synw_870[j++]);
} else {
if ((m & dev->ultra_map[c]) != 0) {
atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x19, synu[j++]);
@@ -2754,7 +2761,10 @@ phase_outs:
}
continue;
phase_ins:
- atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x14, 0x06);
+ if (dev->dev_id == ATP885_DEVID || dev->dev_id == ATP880_DEVID1 || dev->dev_id == ATP880_DEVID2)
+ atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x14, 0x06);
+ else
+ atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x14, 0xff);
atp_writeb_io(dev, c, 0x18, 0x20);
k = 0;
phase_ins1:
@@ -2809,14 +2819,21 @@ tar_dcons:
if (mbuf[3] > 0x64) {
continue;
}
- if (mbuf[4] > 0x0e) {
- mbuf[4] = 0x0e;
+ if (dev->dev_id == ATP885_DEVID || dev->dev_id == ATP880_DEVID1 || dev->dev_id == ATP880_DEVID2) {
+ if (mbuf[4] > 0x0e) {
+ mbuf[4] = 0x0e;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (mbuf[4] > 0x0c) {
+ mbuf[4] = 0x0c;
+ }
}
dev->id[c][i].devsp = mbuf[4];
- if (mbuf[3] < 0x0c) {
- j = 0xb0;
- goto set_syn_ok;
- }
+ if (dev->dev_id == ATP885_DEVID || dev->dev_id == ATP880_DEVID1 || dev->dev_id == ATP880_DEVID2)
+ if (mbuf[3] < 0x0c) {
+ j = 0xb0;
+ goto set_syn_ok;
+ }
if ((mbuf[3] < 0x0d) && (rmb == 0)) {
j = 0xa0;
goto set_syn_ok;
--
Ondrej Zary
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-03 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-03 17:31 [RFC PATCH 00/34] atp870u: Remove the first level of crap Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 01/34] atp870u: Remove workport Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 02/34] atp870u: Remove tmport1 Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 03/34] atp870u: Untangle tmport Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 04/34] atp870u: Untangle tmport #2 Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 05/34] atp870u: Untangle tmport #3 Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 06/34] atp870u: Untangle tmport #4 Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 07/34] atp870u: Untangle tmport #5 Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 08/34] atp870u: Untangle tmport #6 Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 09/34] atp870u: Untangle tmport #7 Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 10/34] atp870u: Untangle tmport #8 Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 11/34] atp870u: Untangle tmpcip Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 12/34] atp870u: Untangle tmpcip #2 Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 13/34] atp870u: Remove ugly gotos Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 14/34] atp870u: Remove ugly gotos #2 Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 15/34] atp870u: Remove ugly gotos #3 Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 16/34] atp870u: Remove ugly gotos #4 Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 17/34] atp870u: Remove ugly gotos #5 Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 18/34] atp870u: Introduce HW access wrappers Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 19/34] atp870u: Convert is870() to use wrappers Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 20/34] atp870u: Convert is880() " Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 21/34] atp870u: Convert is885() " Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 22/34] atp870u: Unify code format in is870(), is880() and is885() Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 23/34] atp870u: Add channel parameter to is870() and is880() Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 24/34] atp870u: Move chip-specific lines out of is880() and is885() Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 25/34] atp870u: Remove is880() Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 26/34] atp870u: Add wide_chip parameter to is870() and is885() Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` Ondrej Zary [this message]
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 28/34] atp870u: Move 870-specific code out of is870() Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 29/34] atp870u: Remove is870() Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 30/34] atp870u: Rename is885() to atp_is() Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 31/34] atp870u: Convert remaining in[bwl] and out[bwl] to wrappers Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 32/34] atp870u: Replace port 0x80 delay by udelay Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 33/34] atp870u: Fix incorrect writeb_io access to register 0x3a Ondrej Zary
2015-05-03 17:31 ` [PATCH 34/34] atp870u: Introduce atp_set_host_id Ondrej Zary
2015-05-11 9:06 ` [RFC PATCH 00/34] atp870u: Remove the first level of crap Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1430674310-11576-28-git-send-email-linux@rainbow-software.org \
--to=linux@rainbow-software.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).