From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: ygardi@codeaurora.org
Cc: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, kishon@ti.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, santoshsy@gmail.com,
linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org, subhashj@codeaurora.org,
gbroner@codeaurora.org, dovl@codeaurora.org,
Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@gmail.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jbottomley@odin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] scsi: ufs-qcom: update configuration option of SCSI_UFS_QCOM component
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 12:14:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432203266.21715.148.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13293a67c19b0c18d2c99386dcf159ea.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org>
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 10:09 +0000, ygardi@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:22 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Am I missing something obvious here? Because ufs-qcom currently looks
> > pointless to me, and I actually see little reason to even have it in the
> > mainline tree.
> >
>
> we haven't uploaded yet the patch that binds qcom vops to the driver, but
> we will soon.
Perhaps you could make that patch part of v2 of this series. I see
little point in this series without that patch. Perhaps someone else
still cares about it, but I'm not looking at it anymore.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-21 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-19 13:47 [PATCH v1 0/3] fixing building errors and warnings when components Yaniv Gardi
2015-05-19 13:47 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] phy: qcom-ufs: fix build error when the driver is built as a module Yaniv Gardi
2015-05-20 8:14 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-20 9:40 ` ygardi
2015-05-19 13:47 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] scsi: ufs-qcom: fix compilation warning if compiled " Yaniv Gardi
2015-05-20 8:29 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-20 13:49 ` ygardi
2015-05-19 13:47 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] scsi: ufs-qcom: update configuration option of SCSI_UFS_QCOM component Yaniv Gardi
2015-05-20 7:21 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-20 8:22 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-21 7:16 ` Paul Bolle
2015-05-21 10:09 ` ygardi
2015-05-21 10:14 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2015-05-21 17:18 ` ygardi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1432203266.21715.148.camel@x220 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=dovl@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gbroner@codeaurora.org \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=jbottomley@odin.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=santoshsy@gmail.com \
--cc=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vinholikatti@gmail.com \
--cc=ygardi@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox