From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [patch] ses: tighten range checks in ses_intf_add() Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 14:01:20 -0800 Message-ID: <1446760880.2211.31.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <----An------QYmAn$10b010ca-f710-44aa-8ea3-3b65a3c21286@alibaba-inc.com> <20151019134820.GA28752@mwanda> <20151105215255.GN7289@mwanda> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:33100 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754274AbbKEWBW (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2015 17:01:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20151105215255.GN7289@mwanda> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Carpenter Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A8=8B=E5=90=9B=28=E6=88=90=E6=B7=BC=29?= , throber3 , security@kernel.org On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 00:52 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > James, could you take a look at this? My patch was really incomplete > and even the bits that I wrote were buggy... :/ This might be easier > for someone who is familiar with the code and can say what the expected > ranges are etc. Yes, I've got a couple of SES things to look into, but not until after the merge window closes, probably. James