From: "Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sd: fixup capacity calculation for 4k drives
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:16:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1458656217.17965.48.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56F0F0E8.6060302@suse.de>
On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 08:14 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 03/22/2016 02:16 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> writes:
> >
> > Hannes> in sd_read_capacity() the sdkp->capacity field changes its
> > Hannes> meaning: after the call to read_capacity_XX() it carries the
> > Hannes> _unscaled_ values, making the comparison between the original
> > Hannes> value and the new value always false for drives with a sector
> > Hannes> size != 512. So introduce a 'new_capacity' carrying the new,
> > Hannes> scaled, capacity.
> >
> > I agree with Christoph.
> >
> > How about something like this instead?
> >
> I've coded it somewhat different, but this one works as well.
> But please modify the description in sd.h, as with this patch
> 'sdkp->capacity' is the _unscaled_ value.
> Might lead to confusion otherwise.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.h b/drivers/scsi/sd.h
> index 5f2a84a..5ed7434 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.h
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ struct scsi_disk {
> struct device dev;
> struct gendisk *disk;
> atomic_t openers;
> - sector_t capacity; /* size in 512-byte sectors */
> + sector_t capacity; /* size in logical sectors */
> u32 max_xfer_blocks;
> u32 opt_xfer_blocks;
> u32 max_ws_blocks;
>
> (Apologies for the mangled patch)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hannes
If we change the meaning of the scsi_disk->capacity field to be logical
sectors, we also have to change sd_getgeo() in sd.c, do we not?
The ->capacity field is also accessed by last_sector_hacks() in
drivers/usb/storage/transport.c, although it kind of looks like
that code might not have been correct for 4K sectors with the
scaled value.
-Ewan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-22 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-21 12:27 [PATCH] sd: fixup capacity calculation for 4k drives Hannes Reinecke
2016-03-21 14:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-22 1:16 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-03-22 6:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-03-22 7:14 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-03-22 14:16 ` Ewan D. Milne [this message]
2016-03-29 1:14 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-03-29 1:18 ` [PATCH v2] sd: Fix excessive capacity printing on devices with blocks bigger than 512 bytes Martin K. Petersen
2016-03-30 8:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-03-30 16:34 ` Ewan D. Milne
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-29 8:06 [PATCH] sd: fixup capacity calculation for 4k drives Hannes Reinecke
2016-04-10 2:02 ` Lee Duncan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1458656217.17965.48.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox