linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@linux.intel.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Bart van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
	James Bottomley <james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] libfc: Update rport reference counting
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 09:39:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1464107944.29525.1.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464070318-69866-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>

On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 08:11 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Originally libfc would just be initializing the refcount to '1',
> and using the disc_mutex to synchronize if and when the final put
> should be happening.
> This has a race condition as the mutex might be delayed, causing
> other threads to access an invalid structure.
> This patch updates the rport reference counting to increase the
> reference every time 'rport_lookup' is called, and decreases
> the reference correspondingly.
> This removes the need to hold 'disc_mutex' when removing the
> structure, and avoids the above race condition.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c |  7 +------
>  drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c | 19 ++++++++++-------
>  drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> ----------
>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c
> b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c
> index 3e83d48..ada4bde 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe_ctlr.c
> @@ -2496,14 +2496,13 @@ static int fcoe_ctlr_vn_lookup(struct
> fcoe_ctlr *fip, u32 port_id, u8 *mac)
>  	struct fcoe_rport *frport;
>  	int ret = -1;
>  
> -	rcu_read_lock();
>  	rdata = lport->tt.rport_lookup(lport, port_id);
>  	if (rdata) {
>  		frport = fcoe_ctlr_rport(rdata);
>  		memcpy(mac, frport->enode_mac, ETH_ALEN);
>  		ret = 0;
> +		kref_put(&rdata->kref, lport->tt.rport_destroy);
>  	}
> -	rcu_read_unlock();
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> @@ -2585,11 +2584,7 @@ static void fcoe_ctlr_vn_beacon(struct
> fcoe_ctlr *fip,
>  		fcoe_ctlr_vn_send(fip, FIP_SC_VN_PROBE_REQ,
> fcoe_all_vn2vn, 0);
>  		return;
>  	}
> -	mutex_lock(&lport->disc.disc_mutex);
>  	rdata = lport->tt.rport_lookup(lport, new->ids.port_id);
> -	if (rdata)
> -		kref_get(&rdata->kref);
> -	mutex_unlock(&lport->disc.disc_mutex);
>  	if (rdata) {
>  		if (rdata->ids.node_name == new->ids.node_name &&
>  		    rdata->ids.port_name == new->ids.port_name) {
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
> b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
> index e01a298..b9b44da 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
> @@ -2090,7 +2090,7 @@ int fc_lport_bsg_request(struct fc_bsg_job
> *job)
>  	struct fc_rport *rport;
>  	struct fc_rport_priv *rdata;
>  	int rc = -EINVAL;
> -	u32 did;
> +	u32 did, tov;
>  
>  	job->reply->reply_payload_rcv_len = 0;
>  	if (rsp)
> @@ -2121,15 +2121,20 @@ int fc_lport_bsg_request(struct fc_bsg_job
> *job)
>  
>  	case FC_BSG_HST_CT:
>  		did = ntoh24(job->request->rqst_data.h_ct.port_id);
> -		if (did == FC_FID_DIR_SERV)
> +		if (did == FC_FID_DIR_SERV) {
>  			rdata = lport->dns_rdata;
> -		else
> +			if (!rdata)
> +				break;
> +			tov = rdata->e_d_tov;
> +		} else {
>  			rdata = lport->tt.rport_lookup(lport, did);
> +			if (!rdata)
> +				break;
> +			tov = rdata->e_d_tov;
> +			kref_put(&rdata->kref, lport-
> >tt.rport_destroy);
> +		}
>  
> -		if (!rdata)
> -			break;
> -
> -		rc = fc_lport_ct_request(job, lport, did, rdata-
> >e_d_tov);
> +		rc = fc_lport_ct_request(job, lport, did, tov);
>  		break;
>  
>  	case FC_BSG_HST_ELS_NOLOGIN:
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
> b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
> index 589ff9a..93f5961 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
> @@ -95,17 +95,23 @@ static const char *fc_rport_state_names[] = {
>   * @lport:   The local port to lookup the remote port on
>   * @port_id: The remote port ID to look up
>   *
> - * The caller must hold either disc_mutex or rcu_read_lock().
> + * The reference count of the fc_rport_priv structure is
> + * increased by one.
>   */
>  static struct fc_rport_priv *fc_rport_lookup(const struct fc_lport
> *lport,
>  					     u32 port_id)
>  {
> -	struct fc_rport_priv *rdata;
> +	struct fc_rport_priv *rdata = NULL, *tmp_rdata;
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry_rcu(rdata, &lport->disc.rports, peers)
> -		if (rdata->ids.port_id == port_id)
> -			return rdata;
> -	return NULL;
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp_rdata, &lport->disc.rports,
> peers)
> +		if (tmp_rdata->ids.port_id == port_id &&
> +		    kref_get_unless_zero(&tmp_rdata->kref)) {
> +			rdata = tmp_rdata;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	return rdata;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -340,7 +346,6 @@ static void fc_rport_work(struct work_struct
> *work)
>  			fc_remote_port_delete(rport);
>  		}
>  
> -		mutex_lock(&lport->disc.disc_mutex);
>  		mutex_lock(&rdata->rp_mutex);
>  		if (rdata->rp_state == RPORT_ST_DELETE) {
>  			if (port_id == FC_FID_DIR_SERV) {
> @@ -370,7 +375,6 @@ static void fc_rport_work(struct work_struct
> *work)
>  				fc_rport_enter_ready(rdata);
>  			mutex_unlock(&rdata->rp_mutex);
>  		}
> -		mutex_unlock(&lport->disc.disc_mutex);
>  		break;
>  
>  	default:
> @@ -702,7 +706,7 @@ out:
>  err:
>  	mutex_unlock(&rdata->rp_mutex);
>  put:
> -	kref_put(&rdata->kref, rdata->local_port->tt.rport_destroy);
> +	kref_put(&rdata->kref, lport->tt.rport_destroy);
>  	return;
>  bad:
>  	FC_RPORT_DBG(rdata, "Bad FLOGI response\n");
> @@ -762,8 +766,6 @@ static void fc_rport_recv_flogi_req(struct
> fc_lport *lport,
>  	FC_RPORT_ID_DBG(lport, sid, "Received FLOGI request\n");
>  
>  	disc = &lport->disc;
> -	mutex_lock(&disc->disc_mutex);
> -
>  	if (!lport->point_to_multipoint) {
>  		rjt_data.reason = ELS_RJT_UNSUP;
>  		rjt_data.explan = ELS_EXPL_NONE;
> @@ -808,7 +810,7 @@ static void fc_rport_recv_flogi_req(struct
> fc_lport *lport,
>  		mutex_unlock(&rdata->rp_mutex);
>  		rjt_data.reason = ELS_RJT_FIP;
>  		rjt_data.explan = ELS_EXPL_NOT_NEIGHBOR;
> -		goto reject;
> +		goto reject_put;
>  	case RPORT_ST_FLOGI:
>  	case RPORT_ST_PLOGI_WAIT:
>  	case RPORT_ST_PLOGI:
> @@ -825,13 +827,13 @@ static void fc_rport_recv_flogi_req(struct
> fc_lport *lport,
>  		mutex_unlock(&rdata->rp_mutex);
>  		rjt_data.reason = ELS_RJT_BUSY;
>  		rjt_data.explan = ELS_EXPL_NONE;
> -		goto reject;
> +		goto reject_put;
>  	}
>  	if (fc_rport_login_complete(rdata, fp)) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&rdata->rp_mutex);
>  		rjt_data.reason = ELS_RJT_LOGIC;
>  		rjt_data.explan = ELS_EXPL_NONE;
> -		goto reject;
> +		goto reject_put;
>  	}
>  
>  	fp = fc_frame_alloc(lport, sizeof(*flp));
> @@ -851,12 +853,13 @@ static void fc_rport_recv_flogi_req(struct
> fc_lport *lport,
>  		fc_rport_state_enter(rdata, RPORT_ST_PLOGI_WAIT);
>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&rdata->rp_mutex);
> -	mutex_unlock(&disc->disc_mutex);
> +	kref_put(&rdata->kref, lport->tt.rport_destroy);
>  	fc_frame_free(rx_fp);
>  	return;
>  
> +reject_put:
> +	kref_put(&rdata->kref, lport->tt.rport_destroy);
>  reject:
> -	mutex_unlock(&disc->disc_mutex);
>  	lport->tt.seq_els_rsp_send(rx_fp, ELS_LS_RJT, &rjt_data);
>  	fc_frame_free(rx_fp);
>  }
> @@ -923,7 +926,7 @@ out:
>  	fc_frame_free(fp);
>  err:
>  	mutex_unlock(&rdata->rp_mutex);
> -	kref_put(&rdata->kref, rdata->local_port->tt.rport_destroy);
> +	kref_put(&rdata->kref, lport->tt.rport_destroy);
>  }
>  
>  static bool
> @@ -1477,14 +1480,11 @@ static void fc_rport_recv_els_req(struct
> fc_lport *lport, struct fc_frame *fp)
>  	struct fc_rport_priv *rdata;
>  	struct fc_seq_els_data els_data;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&lport->disc.disc_mutex);
>  	rdata = lport->tt.rport_lookup(lport, fc_frame_sid(fp));
> -	if (!rdata) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&lport->disc.disc_mutex);
> +	if (!rdata)
>  		goto reject;
> -	}
> +
>  	mutex_lock(&rdata->rp_mutex);
> -	mutex_unlock(&lport->disc.disc_mutex);
>  
>  	switch (rdata->rp_state) {
>  	case RPORT_ST_PRLI:
> @@ -1494,6 +1494,7 @@ static void fc_rport_recv_els_req(struct
> fc_lport *lport, struct fc_frame *fp)
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		mutex_unlock(&rdata->rp_mutex);
> +		kref_put(&rdata->kref, lport->tt.rport_destroy);
>  		goto reject;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1524,6 +1525,7 @@ static void fc_rport_recv_els_req(struct
> fc_lport *lport, struct fc_frame *fp)
>  	}
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&rdata->rp_mutex);
> +	kref_put(&rdata->kref, rdata->local_port->tt.rport_destroy);
>  	return;
>  
>  reject:
> @@ -1907,7 +1909,6 @@ static void fc_rport_recv_logo_req(struct
> fc_lport *lport, struct fc_frame *fp)
>  
>  	sid = fc_frame_sid(fp);
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&lport->disc.disc_mutex);
>  	rdata = lport->tt.rport_lookup(lport, sid);
>  	if (rdata) {
>  		mutex_lock(&rdata->rp_mutex);
> @@ -1916,10 +1917,10 @@ static void fc_rport_recv_logo_req(struct
> fc_lport *lport, struct fc_frame *fp)
>  
>  		fc_rport_enter_delete(rdata, RPORT_EV_LOGO);
>  		mutex_unlock(&rdata->rp_mutex);
> +		kref_put(&rdata->kref, rdata->local_port-
> >tt.rport_destroy);
>  	} else
>  		FC_RPORT_ID_DBG(lport, sid,
>  				"Received LOGO from non-logged-in
> port\n");
> -	mutex_unlock(&lport->disc.disc_mutex);
>  	fc_frame_free(fp);
>  }

Looks good.

Acked-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com>
>  
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-24 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-24  6:11 [PATCHv2] libfc: Update rport reference counting Hannes Reinecke
2016-05-24 16:39 ` Vasu Dev [this message]
2016-06-14 10:20 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-06-15  1:10 ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1464107944.29525.1.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=vasu.dev@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).