From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
To: kishon@ti.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vinholikatti@gmail.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: subhashj@codeaurora.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@codeaurora.org>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/10] phy: qcom-ufs: remove failure when rx/tx_iface_clk are absent
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 19:58:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476800897-19898-2-git-send-email-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476800897-19898-1-git-send-email-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
From: Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@codeaurora.org>
Since in future UFS Phy's the tx_iface_clk and rx_iface_clk
are no longer exist, we should not fail when their initialization
fail, but rather just report with debug message.
Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
---
No change since v1.
drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
index 107cb57..183ec04 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
@@ -186,16 +186,27 @@ ufs_qcom_phy_init_clks(struct phy *generic_phy,
struct ufs_qcom_phy *phy_common)
{
int err;
+ struct ufs_qcom_phy *phy = get_ufs_qcom_phy(generic_phy);
err = ufs_qcom_phy_clk_get(generic_phy, "tx_iface_clk",
&phy_common->tx_iface_clk);
+ /*
+ * tx_iface_clk does not exist in newer version of ufs-phy HW,
+ * so don't return error if it is not found
+ */
if (err)
- goto out;
+ dev_dbg(phy->dev, "%s: failed to get tx_iface_clk\n",
+ __func__);
err = ufs_qcom_phy_clk_get(generic_phy, "rx_iface_clk",
&phy_common->rx_iface_clk);
+ /*
+ * rx_iface_clk does not exist in newer version of ufs-phy HW,
+ * so don't return error if it is not found
+ */
if (err)
- goto out;
+ dev_dbg(phy->dev, "%s: failed to get rx_iface_clk\n",
+ __func__);
err = ufs_qcom_phy_clk_get(generic_phy, "ref_clk_src",
&phy_common->ref_clk_src);
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-18 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-18 14:28 [PATCH v2 00/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and ufs-qcom hcd Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` Vivek Gautam [this message]
2016-10-18 18:38 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] phy: qcom-ufs: remove failure when rx/tx_iface_clk are absent Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-18 21:18 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-19 17:20 ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-29 20:21 ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary BUG_ON Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Use devm sibling of kstrdup for regulator names Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Discard remove callback for drivers Vivek Gautam
2016-10-26 20:20 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-10-29 20:16 ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Cleanup clock and regulator initialization Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary function declarations Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 18:41 ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Move clock and regulator init out of phy init Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH 08/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 20:13 ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-19 17:45 ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-19 19:18 ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-20 3:44 ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] scsi/ufs: qcom: Add phy_exit call in hcd exit path Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 20:19 ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove common layer phy exit callback Vivek Gautam
2016-10-19 0:07 ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-25 0:40 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and ufs-qcom hcd Martin K. Petersen
2016-10-25 6:00 ` Vivek Gautam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1476800897-19898-2-git-send-email-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
--to=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vinholikatti@gmail.com \
--cc=ygardi@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).